Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79047-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:42:51 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, 
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, 
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, 
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 00/16] sleepable bpf_timer (was: allow
 HID-BPF to do device IOs)
Message-ID: <jtbgxp72kov3m3nxmtrcyfj4k2vediypuykkfdpnlm2tviys7h@brzusbk6pyku>
References: <20240221-hid-bpf-sleepable-v3-0-1fb378ca6301@kernel.org>
 <e95cebb8f6a7ede5d40b4becf58cb578a5c4cf58.camel@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e95cebb8f6a7ede5d40b4becf58cb578a5c4cf58.camel@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Feb 23 2024, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:25 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > [Partly a RFC/formal submission: there are still FIXMEs in the code]
> > [Also using bpf-next as the base tree for HID changes as there will
> > be conflicting changes otherwise, so I'm personaly fine for the HID
> > commits to go through bpf-next]
> 
> [...]
> 
> Could you please also add verifier selftests, e.g. extend
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c       (bpf side)
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c  (userspace side triggering
>                                                  bpf side)
> Negative tests could be added in
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c
> 
> Please let me know if you need any help setting up local BPF test
> environment, I have a short writeup on how to set it up in chroot.

Thanks a lot for your review (and Alexei's). I was actually off today
and will be off next Monday too, but I'll work on those tests next week.

Cheers,
Benjamin