Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79050-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:46:04 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, 
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, 
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, 
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf/verifier: introduce
 in_sleepable() helper
Message-ID: <qajvrsg3neipbcmktzuxm7dpee6qaobgvq35bccupayoa6avff@56no2hfgitkk>
References: <20240221-hid-bpf-sleepable-v3-0-1fb378ca6301@kernel.org>
 <20240221-hid-bpf-sleepable-v3-2-1fb378ca6301@kernel.org>
 <CAADnVQKotZ0ki6p4DAydj=XE9hU6pPc+FdqU_WQ99NBK-qSe+A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKotZ0ki6p4DAydj=XE9hU6pPc+FdqU_WQ99NBK-qSe+A@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 22 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 8:25 AM Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org> wrote:
> > @@ -18193,7 +18198,7 @@ static int resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> >                                 return -E2BIG;
> >                         }
> >
> > -                       if (env->prog->aux->sleepable)
> > +                       if (in_sleepable(env))
> >                                 atomic64_inc(&map->sleepable_refcnt);
> 
> this one doesn't look correct.
> The verifier didn't start its main loop when resolve_pseudo_ldimm64()
> is called.
> It also loses symmetry with other sleepable_refcnt operations
> in syscall.c and core.c
> 
> I reverted this hunk and applied patches 1,2,3
> with minor edits, like removing unnecessary parens in patch 3,
> and patch subject rewords.

Thanks a lot. I'll work on the rest of the series next week.

Cheers,
Benjamin