Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp75211rbb; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:14:55 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXEkBHReHZHTfHlRHl+h2nbskPtrO4DQwkwiTYnKa5XsVTgazCyvKrjI0pcakzi3FNxEWJP42POB9ZDcpBeOszI1tRE6EEk3AqzZPVO6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFG7B9Vk4Tvk+F5tjtx6UzSOkaRyjgtU5t0BeqI3FgU9gmxkOtQbGXJFhLUuEd1jOatXFwM X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2342:b0:1d9:9c96:673c with SMTP id c2-20020a170903234200b001d99c96673cmr914921plh.46.1708719295017; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:14:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e17-20020a170902ef5100b001dc64f192a3si2304846plx.450.2024.02.23.12.14.54 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:14:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79081-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Zr6mgTnD; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79081-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-79081-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C6E285FD0 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14C9146E60; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Zr6mgTnD" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53331170E for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708719289; cv=none; b=KKkJnbjFh1htQwyeiCiqckdzprYd2crHNXtVfb2/rYqWE0ODHo6SsDegvH9nJy026VB3VzktK/JWy/jA1WNsF8hDlEQIH+Zqdnr/rXXlRB1n2B6y5wr5nGtrF9Y+IwTiZe10pvdgmIMUVyEvialsI7EfgMeR/dVfuuUPMgEOfw4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708719289; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GAV0YEZII1KXdP/l7x6m86oj5oYErslcGjKNsLJ+dIQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k2yjocAb5x1ekIm2kdMwy//liid7xcTGIlM+RlihQOt8O8x2yDIl2XKWvO2K1M8KbK5YkPhbs/7JfVPV58UjzJl81MVoiNRH4uRkrQXob8ZDlg6WVPYUX0W28TNkBW8NhmpuPtSyws3podnKfA2YV/stdi/xfUMwJrG+mp/jrpE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Zr6mgTnD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708719287; x=1740255287; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=GAV0YEZII1KXdP/l7x6m86oj5oYErslcGjKNsLJ+dIQ=; b=Zr6mgTnD9Oe9CuMIOKzrSCemutcX/7MzErDaTQ9fF975Xwqe9gVMZYCO evg76VIiv6mqgmjduGqOwJTlCDCcaLMIPvCgtvE5blkGYYX2bf+OYIpxC 6fnyqQhOKm1VZ1x3dRbC6qOU7POxyKn5PXHpXgvh6N0aIvy62lR2gDNxZ BDoNjX6ugLZHJzOeFYUuwB+2DeJrVdZEZs/pFtNiQ0a1H08IbdIM2523Q b4osiMZnG1vHYtil6rmr+mHVDi2Dii/CXkQ2vFccjqPC46gXty5+ta3PS rA+eogRuwDCd/8xHaIa3qP+tiOTeOfSLLNrXr6Mmd5r13Z+61mQzu6XYi w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10993"; a="2929955" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,180,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2929955" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2024 12:14:46 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10993"; a="913755316" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,180,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913755316" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2024 12:14:44 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rdbwP-00000006zlr-3qby; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:14:41 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:14:41 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: "Ruhl, Michael J" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clkdev: Update clkdev id usage to allow for longer names Message-ID: References: <20240223163516.796606-1-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 07:49:33PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:32:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:22:13PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote: > > > >From: Andy Shevchenko > > > >Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 12:43 PM > > > >On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:35:16AM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote: .. > > > >[1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin- > > > >tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh > > > > > > Using your script I got: > > > > > > To: "Michael J. Ruhl" , > > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: Russell King > > > > > > My list (using get_maintainers.pl) is: > > > > > > linux@armlinux.org.uk > > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > They appear to be the same.... > > > > Ah, the Russel's email looked like a mailing list, that what confused me. > > Joe, I think you know that I'll pick up on your mis-spelling of my > name... and I take that as an implicit right to call you something > other than your proper name. :D Since, Javier, you told me that, I now remember some rumors... :D > Secondly, because the Cc contained my name, I fail to see how you can > confuse that with a mailing list. Maybe your script that you mentioned > strips the names from the email addresses, thereby adding to your > confusion - and maybe that isn't such a good idea after all? It's other way around. My script uses full names. > I'm not the only one who uses linux@... There are six people in total listed > in MAINTAINERS who have a linux@... email address there. Yes, but you are the only one which pops up WRT this file. > > > I don't have the plain text part on Russel's email > > > (linxu@armlinux.org.uk)... Is that what is missing? > > > > Yes :-) > > But my script also uses a heuristics (which is not visible here) to add active > > developers of the code in question based on the git history. > > The developers in question for this part of the code is me and not the > CCF. Yes, get_maintainer.pl seems to return that. It's me who naively considered you as CCF maintainer. > Therefore, what has been done by the patch author is reasonable > and no special scripts are necessary. The scripts makes life easier and robust against changes. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko