Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755197AbYAAREU (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:04:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753864AbYAAREI (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:04:08 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:47361 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290AbYAAREG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:04:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:57:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration Message-ID: <20080101165732.GB3488@elte.hu> References: <11979967763153-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <20071219101236.GB3521@elte.hu> <20071231164624.GA1738@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071231164624.GA1738@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 40 * Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > thanks, applied. > > > > btw., people have been talking about reducing the include file mess > > for nearly a decade now, > > Some of us are actually doing it. ;-) sorry, this was really not meant to slight your contributions in this area in any way :-) I'm just judging by the spaghetti still hanging around in asm-x86/*.h, and the 'fun' we have with paravirt and its type dependencies - and the periodic messups we have with macros. (and many macros are not inlines due to ugly dependencies.) > > So include file dependency flattening patches would be more than > > welcome as well. > > Yup! Provided they're compile-tested sufficiently well. as long as it builds/boots on your box with a single convenient .config of yours, we can stick such patches into x86.git and work out all the build failures it might cause. > > (and unlike unification patches they have no expectation of being > > 100% perfect, so a natural ping-pong of fixes, until the changes are > > fully correct, would be natural.) > > That way you'll never clean anything especially during merge window. > ;-) hm, what do you mean? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/