Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756744AbYAAVf6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:35:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754760AbYAAVfv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:35:51 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:58492 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754670AbYAAVfu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:35:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 21:26:32 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christer Weinigel , "David P. Reed" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rene Herman , Paul Rolland , Pavel Machek , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , rol@witbe.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override. Message-ID: <20080101212632.04d7a497@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20080101210143.GB759@elte.hu> References: <47667366.7010405@gmail.com> <4766AE88.4080904@zytor.com> <4766D175.7040807@reed.com> <20071217212509.5edaa372@the-village.bc.nu> <477A634C.8040000@reed.com> <20080101161557.3ce2d5f8@the-village.bc.nu> <20080101164338.GA901@elte.hu> <20080101183238.74307174@weinigel.se> <20080101184659.GA9250@elte.hu> <20080101203518.26e889f2@weinigel.se> <20080101210143.GB759@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 22 > very much care about code size. But it has been stated in this thread > that most of the _p() API uses in the kernel today are bogus. So You missed a word "wrongly". It has been "wrongly stated" I've been going through the ISA cases which are the majority. Generally speaking they are correct. We have a couple of "interesting" PCI users who most definitely want udelay() or removal of _p. We have various chipset cases which want looking at in detail. The ISA drivers however are both the main user and mostly right. > ok, "I dont know but it might be slower" is a perfectly fine statement > instead of your original "it will be slower". If you use wall clock timings it will be slower. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/