Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp1243155rbb; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:30 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUajedvHLjiKjyYGl7mM/i4yvL6B+mbzrLGNyl/U35vcVCU6v31TAhVbT+5NIu/CnkwcDAWROi2KeyFrMg3pfC5yIyFcrkdJcvTR2pSeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbp6aScJPNlJanV9+CP/EnLNQ0rCfgCrCd+SXFCgn8zh80jHK1Gcx3l38Qq4JqL4vi1dWp X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d506:b0:1dc:90a7:65ef with SMTP id b6-20020a170902d50600b001dc90a765efmr6016078plg.23.1708947150674; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y8-20020a17090322c800b001dc6a8dcecesi3596089plg.34.2024.02.26.03.32.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81264-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=Z0ZOaD6e; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81264-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-81264-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6046C2890F1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BB41DA3A; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="Z0ZOaD6e" Received: from mail-vk1-f182.google.com (mail-vk1-f182.google.com [209.85.221.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09C91D54F for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708947143; cv=none; b=UKhe1DFrcuPhQ1P8uolshXxbNQfI1GMB+RfEJwuOoBV3ss9oENVHiNg7JuT2s35OuaWSejB+yZbV3CsCrfZibMXPP4nh41/fAZ3Z5edp4EVavm0bT7GA7Bbvtq5ZSo6EZcHZII7s6sB7DzyF7q/70LFhom7u6FEa0s4OG1zIbXs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708947143; c=relaxed/simple; bh=59M376lOs4RpQY+QsNbUdwZI7JBMTstkeh/+AItoW50=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=V0OfBVknTQ6HbX85fE1oAjlPvXK2IX6aFA1DJGMqWoy68x6LVZ1GGwbKmh52aHWenTM+xhnbFyYCrSAvULH/cUbNLcL4bGL6m0QsCcXYOuM/2bUVMNvhdFhBEZ0wyWqJyWifw2eQW9iaMCkqhIo6XHuY6OJF0dEU626N/5SxdsY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=Z0ZOaD6e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Received: by mail-vk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4cdfcb24b79so250334e0c.3 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1708947140; x=1709551940; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=59M376lOs4RpQY+QsNbUdwZI7JBMTstkeh/+AItoW50=; b=Z0ZOaD6eybQBscd+8EgGWeZd0VY13t1dTQJM1jgrTRfY5iEryI5L/xiqShblky8qXW qVNIfldjgR4jJwGX2CuI/WAeM7IR+4N/CUrw6Qgecq5RapwkStTBqM+0HGi8f2wUc1C/ 8PaGxyzR6lk6ilDx5Dv3+XCKu7u+a/tuv9+sw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708947140; x=1709551940; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=59M376lOs4RpQY+QsNbUdwZI7JBMTstkeh/+AItoW50=; b=xHxovdiVO1m/RqRyJ2Dm/Hme/YQTwMByxMS5et18zkNhbi7W+NaexlTJKQqd1AfKoG loZWJnzKyqWKFQ7O/mXYWGvlvKEnxYpOZeyCnb0bdai7VwHdF6pwbwfJktrkHSsKfg+F wSGJgHKrHvPHi16GccP+Oh/8WVRnM9+m57s2fmo8yJ1qTxHNBtOILPCQgIHp9/yz+blC NMYQJdyXIJuGxGPuRjrM8xZMqzQkxWEVHN4/kiHjw4DdfJpOH+066OTz38GJM0EnxPCI jAKkC5dWMYDSSKGVTddMrBH1HRCSnh+VI19s+o2pqNolB561cta5ET0eaanTIXTJUCwS Irlg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVeX+g5HVdDpsR6vx1hQ7SbQMitojwsuRle/HYYH1Zivswnws39uaHK40bzTPcvkn5MZZnDXBTeZL58e0H7WrMdmWMb1OFI08TOsSHc X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+Q2jh10fQ++MlUcHjenE2WL2+Ck4heLos2TZUaElysGCYiMY+ 1KXY5yoXRiselhD6xW3IN1W+YoL+O5aCW8WUb2osBLtez944aYvSWyMV1ktkxPBADK2XjXuiHbt GwA== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:e743:0:b0:4c0:25a4:95bb with SMTP id e64-20020a1fe743000000b004c025a495bbmr2699592vkh.8.1708947140573; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com. [209.85.217.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id et1-20020a0561221c0100b004d13bb918c4sm593163vkb.33.2024.02.26.03.32.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-471e6e9482eso128165137.1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:19 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVQub2jt/zZyi2LX7/7w17wAtRpXWS0fd0zP+vuLszpt0LYg+vgn/XVC8HUOrXjyOKIbHw9lC9aQcnaY+z5+fWcja9wH+aRHesSaADL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3a0f:b0:471:e2ca:4023 with SMTP id b15-20020a0561023a0f00b00471e2ca4023mr2137374vsu.25.1708947138994; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:32:18 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240226080721.3331649-1-fshao@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20240226080721.3331649-1-fshao@chromium.org> From: Fei Shao Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:31:42 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Support MT8195 OVL compatible in mtk_drm_drv To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Matthias Brugger , Philipp Zabel , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:07=E2=80=AFPM Fei Shao wrote= : > > Specify the component type for mediatek,mt8195-disp-ovl in the MediaTek > DRM driver on top of commit 76cdcb87d391 ("drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 ovl > driver support"). > > With this, the compatible can function as an independent fallback for > other display overlays without relying on MT8192. > > Signed-off-by: Fei Shao Please disregard this patch. With the feedback in [1], I can also fix the issue from within the SoC's device tree. Even taking a step back, I just learned that this is a duplicate of [2], so it makes no sense to merge mine in any case. Sorry for the noise. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c4814e25-42c9-4604-b86a-8ef0bd634f78@colla= bora.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240215101119.12629-3-shawn.sung@mediatek= com/ Regards, Fei