Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81521-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:44:08 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the gpio-brgl tree
Message-ID: <20240226134408.GA37938@google.com>
References: <20240226174117.722301b9@canb.auug.org.au>
 <CAMRc=MctN=PqM6O3GxvcFuk2ZT2YcqTiKZiuCiaTnXDEV+gXaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240226110424.GA120668@google.com>
 <CAMRc=Md3pfEWcMSoVjdj7_o9MJQUShfKL6=XyWVm3MqEWKFX9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Md3pfEWcMSoVjdj7_o9MJQUShfKL6=XyWVm3MqEWKFX9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:04 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:41 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The following commit is also in the mfd tree as A different commit
> > > > (but the same patch):
> > > >
> > > >   4a7b0850fc7a ("dt-bindings: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
> > > >
> > > > This is commit
> > > >
> > > >   7b79740d42e7 ("dt-bindings: mfd: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
> > > >
> > > > in the mfd tree.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Stephen Rothwell
> > >
> > > Hi Stephen, Lee!
> > >
> > > I picked it up because I was already queuing the patch adding the GPIO
> > > driver. Unless there are conflicts with the MFD branch (doesn't seem
> > > like it?), I think it should go through the GPIO branch together with
> > > the driver.
> >
> > This is the first I've heard of it.  There was no reply from you, even
> > after I specifically asked you for an explanation.
> >
> 
> Huh, I now see your email in lore[1] but I don't have it in my inbox,
> not even in spam. I would have answered otherwise.
> 
> > There is no convincing reason for this to follow the C change.  It's
> > more important to avoid Linus from facing merge-conflicts during the
> > merge-window. Please remove the patch from your tree.
> >
> 
> This is why I'm asking if this caused a conflict. Whatever, I'll drop
> it alright.

Maybe there aren't any conflicts yet, but we are still early in the
cycle and prevention is better than cure.  Thanks for dropping it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]