Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp1336952rbb; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:22:59 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUP/dMK2Equ1xu/S03UIHkvhNRk/Wp9Y+qEmJaZBBkMM7zzh8cZMIgeSnZ2RDvyXjiQx3oPgiAM3GaWl/yCSMo6fz4cAEm1aN4dApNj/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFfY5g//ky+UxX+xV0f8Mu2vh32VvoYu+NRHczbj2YUXLBJTAhCdwzflNkzjEFxXZIxaWFk X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c58b:0:b0:566:1794:394c with SMTP id g11-20020aa7c58b000000b005661794394cmr777154edq.24.1708957379006; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:22:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708957378; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gfxF2yJK30VGNxQeCyp96HDUaJqlnO+xOIM/a46vCpW6G5+EwnbPghaZQ3pzRctQjv 5/TrsaZ/wwORRn+Ww5JmaTdJuPMUPIfcqi96LQBg8hWAVA8rw03jyHdqPz3qhsPtn6PI BvUY/04XjPY/sDpQyzQ/exGWn01KlAnSxdEfq2EMd5E8F7ru6Y33+umeACXurqjKOt2F AtZoCiO5jmELGBMg1n9qPVH1M8e6YT69ta4MTMiU63WrDZ6TbVlUVbRiodPnVoBmjrvx 8DITgBqXDeQjs3Cu5+GoBPvmA4t/UdnBcINk1qzFWTrFdV+leDRwDVeeKCWxL14O/MV2 4svA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=2GkNOw5QpbIjcnEa8hertH5KYBOVS1V90XYQHHukH+0=; fh=wm/PuDf5kO+3RFpgEWpn6tkOmws9Iy+MHxtReSjFHG4=; b=pD2J58r4Qo0d6NT5V2Nt4DNRRgoSSyUaORKLe8LTEinjpfolXUpld/dRCQzNHjhmvX XwXhzax91SjEzN1Rf6mgFStYpHoJ9pTs+tXmFXIkxCHHqxZnz3S9pzsOhnjoOzFCqVRr qsWzNXuXEUVgX3NAO/UqFbQ5JTcYp5L3T08Xpsqj82cB7veZjeu5I7r/WZxMe5C6mTn4 NOMRVJWeixNqOyH3ceDIcq0KYD7QLWrQx+/YIbMntcGV04bpd/13zVipIB6EAYnjNWHN +qXfmiOTcwUWJNfgtUR5LSFMUh/Et/BEkOJvlecm+gwpAvb1SifL8DvoS+jYn38ffhgZ O3Mw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FO+OY0YE; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-81596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dk21-20020a0564021d9500b0056382b02f44si2191952edb.37.2024.02.26.06.22.58 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FO+OY0YE; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-81596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC83F1F2CD9B for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916F1129A75; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FO+OY0YE" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC631C6B9 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708956852; cv=none; b=mEG09yHx1xglaHOWEjmImmPc4ROU45K7Y2nmFpApqT+GWhfspBjfj6LVh0qi6ns9eXJF+dF+XC/gzXExCnwsS5I+D/9i3vpAjwdLE5gZL23Hu9Ni0pS6hAC6qhmms0CAeXfIC3oClA067QWhSe3tBXFbzKaofIx+h+4U1uGHASo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708956852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LlRCRH3uYk/2lkWlcthuzE6Y+YWYxlmcDmZGNRkMNp8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RbOZUi1MRczeZQB1GtfDpB4snitpZkj7+CgbW3ePrfG++XiSmhxyv5aLHrZpDIs8RcT8y6B9gauDvB1vNLWID5Xo0SzPLQLZyKWO+gs4LnqtyZGaAp0Zb28/hn2nwaTiueGnXVUfevXN4QKonZYHTknNF1jsj9INfSnBQfKV7sY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FO+OY0YE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708956847; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2GkNOw5QpbIjcnEa8hertH5KYBOVS1V90XYQHHukH+0=; b=FO+OY0YE7/v3F5zmkawZ6ewR4/zGn5c9ZeHumWIwOT+Dgm4i6giVU/j1h0Wf7harz09U1D wMlS5ejG8mIc/UhQTgwtNaG/xyloXvzywIWs01cvwccynn1i0w5tqQU0gVzHEvkGZTQjA/ NUGTvFgfgGBa5n3V36dIEE5vNKVv/Ec= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-53-xi-W6UmKPPiav4O4IAf97Q-1; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:13:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xi-W6UmKPPiav4O4IAf97Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6403C025C0; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.224]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072AD1C060B1; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:13:27 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memfd: refactor memfd_tag_pins() and memfd_wait_for_pins() Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:13:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20240226141324.278526-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240226141324.278526-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20240226141324.278526-1-david@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 Both functions are the remaining users of total_mapcount(). Let's get rid of the calls by converting the code to folios. As it turns out, the code is unnecessarily complicated, especially: 1) We can query the number of pagecache references for a folio simply via folio_nr_pages(). This will handle other folio sizes in the future correctly. 2) The xas_set(xas, page->index + cache_count) call to increment the iterator for large folios is not required. Remove it. Further, simplify the XA_CHECK_SCHED check, counting each entry exactly once. Memfd pages can be swapped out when using shmem; leave xa_is_value() checks in place. Co-developed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- mm/memfd.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index d3a1ba4208c90..7d8d3ab3fa378 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -29,29 +29,25 @@ #define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE #define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ +static bool memfd_folio_has_extra_refs(struct folio *folio) +{ + return folio_ref_count(folio) - folio_mapcount(folio) != + folio_nr_pages(folio); +} + static void memfd_tag_pins(struct xa_state *xas) { - struct page *page; + struct folio *folio; int latency = 0; - int cache_count; lru_add_drain(); xas_lock_irq(xas); - xas_for_each(xas, page, ULONG_MAX) { - cache_count = 1; - if (!xa_is_value(page) && - PageTransHuge(page) && !PageHuge(page)) - cache_count = HPAGE_PMD_NR; - - if (!xa_is_value(page) && - page_count(page) - total_mapcount(page) != cache_count) + xas_for_each(xas, folio, ULONG_MAX) { + if (!xa_is_value(folio) && memfd_folio_has_extra_refs(folio)) xas_set_mark(xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); - if (cache_count != 1) - xas_set(xas, page->index + cache_count); - latency += cache_count; - if (latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED) + if (++latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED) continue; latency = 0; @@ -66,16 +62,16 @@ static void memfd_tag_pins(struct xa_state *xas) /* * Setting SEAL_WRITE requires us to verify there's no pending writer. However, * via get_user_pages(), drivers might have some pending I/O without any active - * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all pages + * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all folios * and see whether it has an elevated ref-count. If so, we tag them and wait for * them to be dropped. * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references - * to those pages to avoid races. + * to those folios to avoid races. */ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) { XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, 0); - struct page *page; + struct folio *folio; int error, scan; memfd_tag_pins(&xas); @@ -83,7 +79,6 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) error = 0; for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { int latency = 0; - int cache_count; if (!xas_marked(&xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED)) break; @@ -95,20 +90,15 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) xas_set(&xas, 0); xas_lock_irq(&xas); - xas_for_each_marked(&xas, page, ULONG_MAX, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) { + xas_for_each_marked(&xas, folio, ULONG_MAX, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) { bool clear = true; - cache_count = 1; - if (!xa_is_value(page) && - PageTransHuge(page) && !PageHuge(page)) - cache_count = HPAGE_PMD_NR; - - if (!xa_is_value(page) && cache_count != - page_count(page) - total_mapcount(page)) { + if (!xa_is_value(folio) && + memfd_folio_has_extra_refs(folio)) { /* * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags * we inserted; but make a note that we still - * found pages pinned. + * found folios pinned. */ if (scan == LAST_SCAN) error = -EBUSY; @@ -118,8 +108,7 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) if (clear) xas_clear_mark(&xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); - latency += cache_count; - if (latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED) + if (++latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED) continue; latency = 0; -- 2.43.2