Message-ID: <3C318DCE.8020105@drugphish.ch>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 11:22:06 +0100
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@drugphish.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New tree started ;)
In-Reply-To: <1009835143.7667.0.camel@ohdarn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Hello Michael,

Thanks for doing this. Could you tell me which criteria you have to
choose patches to go in? I see grsecurity in the to be merged queue
which is not likely to ever go into 2.4.x. It's more likely to be 
converted to the LSM framework (parts of it if still needed) and then 
integrated into 2.5.x.

 > Linus once said something about having more trees being a good thing.
 > I'll try to keep this as close to the 2.4.x line as possible, though.

Could you maybe out of consideration for AC use the newest 2.4.x
kernels, in this case 2.4.18pre1?

Happy New Year 2002 and best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/