Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp1375177rbb; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:25:01 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCW7vnBYF38zQ32mDDmdlo0DrMHTNsfa8gnxajkeO9jGM91WVdmtX7bCKiskG8tKajlW9qlwACPJOEhxxIoPCud1Z9ivEQ/yaPTM7mB6Zw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7pyuWfTHjFs7yRPDmCikoW5VHEcTiSv1cjWESHUQZSdw4Fc0obIVL0XZ+UrrR8lfptzYj X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4c3:0:b0:565:ed50:81dc with SMTP id t3-20020aa7d4c3000000b00565ed5081dcmr2157949edr.28.1708961100981; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:25:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708961100; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Whul8ZlYvFlYf7CXYVntsRHmI1InNLjUCegXlNAyM3lty0QYbjd0ySbaoNG0G7SZ8O QFnaBL9A8wu2J+cyU2lbXIURz/kM0u3cCL/aU0amHrXkxZRSKpoC+aynckzL+YOEvHFm G/9S6NuYm12h30ocMgHMmOPpSF+XiC9ySoVP+nf7Boh+pyPHKLAJl16wnbWYiacZ030o eHsk6+rZ/i/uFsl/QOrpSznfvQWJ5o7r+Sm/XLNWfWvzIwDmo2B/IMJMWeWr0j7CL/Ch A6uPaZXggGvPSOJLOi7xxfWWXsV21WVc3VPRPLdNMY5m2vVRNb+nV8/MpWsAbQqchWcO PORg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4ADMQP4UN/Ik+7k8gMkVVVITNDMuvFX3OZ/7TUy/J14=; fh=xldz0gPF4E6Psf3bTcb8ev1f5sfRg8tKUeiy1jT6NRE=; b=h1w99bLIZHHIRrUahCU5X+u5BvIZf1RaOFUVYHgIhb/0JLcS+rkQlXir7VdpZrw/Q2 L3NG39oRpeiiQtyB28XeVFgzs205QdiobqG5iPC4KnxzXXEtLAbggdAvMuW+p3t3mLrd s+jeDjSK5/2GgC3+gFLJCg2TPvzWlwf8XkX/IBSkSRTWlbaoiJ5WqMuyVa2nYiapQJT7 yu/UDThaK41TgsG4lRzZLsxV4NUX/8uqwTBMFoA5OwnY2Q1W+eo8NtCxQzcJYOnCJbUM QcFF51s9O1DA1U1bre4w4KAMroDeQvTPPLHSfjM3xWXVQFYT4fKZb2KAiza21hXXYJzV 7A/Q==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81779-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-81779-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c30-20020a50d65e000000b005634711b1b9si2232352edj.153.2024.02.26.07.25.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:25:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81779-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-81779-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-81779-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82CB21F23CF1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA5F12BEAF; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0E3128811; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708960637; cv=none; b=PfE+tfCTc+XEC+IMOF2yqynanuV/alqPvIuQu/cPqPKRwRZAP4p1MFJrrOukGIMug2jZTdFrzoTunbJvgiRwiK63OdUFs3ceY2Bwt2LKYqK//ANG7GgJDjcqXq7r6kUtYmihZ4ENQHGsDtQ3OJgZG4obJUtsdre//QupH8tBnXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708960637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=09HsgNF9nVk+pfhzUS+EWxSsgRTQA1ssEWqc69aOPkE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B6/DqdmR+ifHbxcU0FUzhVQK/KBiPJzRfWqdinb4gD7YNYqcreIFMmYgJk6fZ09mM4g9PQlPXh50WaMmX5hLj5tJK1xi5nq3AmoQmLY+9DEihwRbDV/F42jRrh4Pg8kdPqA2VWoS5KcmJyuQhtW5sLn2KSe4L65iFNoPdV1pU3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA17DA7; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4C783F762; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:17:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:08 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , "sudeep.holla@arm.com" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Aisheng Dong , Nitin Garg , Ranjani Vaidyanathan , Ye Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX OEM pin configuration type Message-ID: References: <20240223071557.2681316-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 01:16:51PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX OEM pin configuration type > > Sorry to ping early, but this impacts the design and i.MX95 SoC upstream( > although I removed pinctrl to let uboot init pinmux as of now), so I would > like see whether are you ok with the approach or not. This is the best as > of now I could think out to not adding more size to firmware and make the > dts format similar as previous i.MX. > I'll let Linus and Sudeep argument better, but, for my understanding, does this solve all the issue with supporting custom iMX DT pinctrl bindings on top of the current SCMI pinctrl generic driver without the need of your last 2 downstream patches, or I am missing somethimg? Thanks, Cristian