Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757546AbYABGNW (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:13:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755095AbYABGNL (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:13:11 -0500 Received: from rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de ([129.143.116.10]:35330 "EHLO rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbYABGNJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:13:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:13:08 +0100 From: Andreas Mohr To: Greg KH Cc: Alan Stern , Andreas Mohr , Ingo Molnar , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , kernel list , netdev , Pavel Emelyanov , "Denis V. Lunev" , USB list Subject: Re: [usb regression] Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc3] Fix /proc/net breakage Message-ID: <20080102061308.GB30929@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> References: <20071231052500.GB4187@kroah.com> <20071231192643.GA25341@kroah.com> <20080102060006.GA27693@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080102060006.GA27693@kroah.com> X-Priority: none User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 37 Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here. > > In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver. > > In the -mm tree there is a patch, from Tony Jones, that moves some debug > code out of sysfs and into debugfs where it belongs. It does it for > both the ehci and ohci USB host controller drivers, and this is the code > that is incorrect if CONFIG_DEBUGFS is not enabled. > > So, for the 2.6.24 release, nothing needs to be changed, all is good, > and there is no regression. > > Right? Or am I still confused about this whole thing? Probably, since I also wasn't sure about this getting added to the post-2.6.23 regressions. I'd expect this problem to be -mm only myself, but then I didn't actively verify it in code (and I haven't tried -rc6 proper on that machine yet either, build takes ages ;). OK, since I cannot really offer anything other than positive feelings about this being non-rc6 breakage, should I try -rc6 proper, too? > Hm, I wonder if this means I can go back to drinking more holiday > wine... :) .....even more confusion? :) Thanks for your help, Andreas Mohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/