Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758115AbYABHP4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:15:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756382AbYABHPo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:15:44 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:42632 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756171AbYABHPn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:15:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:14:31 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andreas Mohr Cc: Alan Stern , Ingo Molnar , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , kernel list , netdev , Pavel Emelyanov , "Denis V. Lunev" , USB list Subject: Re: [usb regression] Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc3] Fix /proc/net breakage Message-ID: <20080102071431.GA32357@kroah.com> References: <20071231052500.GB4187@kroah.com> <20071231192643.GA25341@kroah.com> <20080102060006.GA27693@kroah.com> <20080102061308.GB30929@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080102061308.GB30929@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1586 Lines: 38 On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:13:08AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here. > > > > In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver. > > > > In the -mm tree there is a patch, from Tony Jones, that moves some debug > > code out of sysfs and into debugfs where it belongs. It does it for > > both the ehci and ohci USB host controller drivers, and this is the code > > that is incorrect if CONFIG_DEBUGFS is not enabled. > > > > So, for the 2.6.24 release, nothing needs to be changed, all is good, > > and there is no regression. > > > > Right? Or am I still confused about this whole thing? > > Probably, since I also wasn't sure about this getting added to the > post-2.6.23 regressions. I'd expect this problem to be -mm only myself, > but then I didn't actively verify it in code (and I haven't tried -rc6 > proper on that machine yet either, build takes ages ;). > OK, since I cannot really offer anything other than positive feelings about > this being non-rc6 breakage, should I try -rc6 proper, too? Please do, that would be very helpful. As the code being discussed isn't even in Linus's tree, it's hard to see how this could be a proposed fix for the regression :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/