Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754627AbYABLlm (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 06:41:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752056AbYABLle (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 06:41:34 -0500 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:58593 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752051AbYABLle (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 06:41:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:41:32 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Stefan Richter cc: Dave Young , Matthew Wilcox , gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: The perfect patch - Posting a patch series (was Re: [PATCH 06/12] pci : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core) In-Reply-To: <477B7219.4080508@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <20071229011057.GG2883@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com> <20071229025506.GL11638@parisc-linux.org> <477632A7.6050208@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <477B7219.4080508@s5r6.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1682 Lines: 33 On Jan 2 2008 12:14, Stefan Richter wrote: >There is nothing wrong with a 0/n posting per se. But whenever you >write a 0/n posting, ask yourself: > - Isn't the information I provide here necessary to keep around by > somebody who takes my patch series into his quilt series or into his > source repository? > - Couldn't the information here be useful at a later point in time > when people look into the mainline Linux history? >If "yes" or "maybe yes", then add this information to the changelogs in >the patches. You can then leave the 0/n posting as is, or make it >briefer, or omit it entirely. Please emit a [0/n] and the [m/n] as a reply so that threading-aware mail readers can collapse and/or use delete-thread-at-a-time feature. If there is no info in [0/n], let it be empty or a one,two-liner brief introduction. >It is never necessary to post a 0/n message, because _everything_ which >could be said in this message can also be said in the i/n messages. >(Things which are not meant for the SCM changelog can be written after a >"---" delimiter line or other patch delimiters.) However, it is >sometimes convenient to repeat or summarize some of the information from >the i/n messages in a 0/n message. Think about convenience of the >_recipients_ though, not about the sender's convenience. And [0/n] sometimes contain a diffstat which gives an approximate line count of how big the patchset actually is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/