Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-82604-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Message-ID: <d95be5da-151c-4f16-ae75-ac2fe27e1259@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:24:00 -0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virt: tdx-guest: Handle GetQuote request error code
Content-Language: en-US
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
 "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
 Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
References: <20240225224244.2072245-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <65dd3c87680e7_1138c729433@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <65dd3c87680e7_1138c729433@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 2/26/24 5:36 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> The tdx-guest driver marshals quote requests via hypercall to have a
>> quoting enclave sign attestation evidence about the current state of
>> the TD. There are 2 possible failures, a transport failure (failure
>> to communicate with the quoting agent) and payload failure (a failed
>> quote). The driver only checks the former, update it to consider the
>> latter payload errors as well.
>>
>> Fixes: f4738f56d1dc ("virt: tdx-guest: Add Quote generation support using TSM_REPORTS")
>> Reported-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-coco/6bdf569c-684a-4459-af7c-4430691804eb@linux.intel.com/T/#u
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> ...if you decide you need a debug print here, or to differentiate the
> error codes based on transport vs payload error that can be a follow-on
> change.
Yes, will do. I will submit a pr_err() cleanup patch soon.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer