Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-82982-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:41:31 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
CC: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, LKML
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mika Westerberg
	<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate Device Check and Bus
 Check notification handling
Message-ID: <20240227094131.0000291c@Huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7632957.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher>
References: <6021126.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher>
	<7632957.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd.
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:46:41 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> There is no particular reason why device object subtree rescans in
> acpi_scan_device_check() and acpi_scan_device_check() should be carried
> out differently, so move the rescan code into a new function called
> acpi_scan_rescan_bus() and make both the functions above invoke it.
> 
> While at it, in the Device Check case, start the device object subtree
> rescan mentioned above from the target device's parent, as per the
> specification. [1]
> 
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#device-object-notification-values # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Thanks,

Jonathan