Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83091-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:04:13 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Miguel
 Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, Wedson Almeida
 Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Gary Guo
	<gary@garyguo.net>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron
	<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Paul Walmsley
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Nathan
 Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scripts: generate_rust_target: enable building on
 RISC-V
Message-ID: <20240227-glove-underwire-f562a56cf2c7@wendy>
References: <20240223-leverage-walmart-5424542cd8bd@spud>
 <20240223-employee-pessimism-03ba0b58db6b@spud>
 <CANiq72ngEZskjH0f=8+cJuQsFTK227bGCxe5G0STMHuPbZYnXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240227-resolved-deceit-4a59a6af5b71@wendy>
 <CANiq72mwM+4Oh-H5WmRoqQ_nE1w-eJ1wn-nEwS=BR9JRwzxMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4yFQMGvLloPM49wl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mwM+4Oh-H5WmRoqQ_nE1w-eJ1wn-nEwS=BR9JRwzxMMQ@mail.gmail.com>

--4yFQMGvLloPM49wl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:46:42AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:17=E2=80=AFAM Conor Dooley
> <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, I'll take a look.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> > Nah, I think that is silly. Either this goes in as-is, and there's
> > fixup done by Linus, or the thing should be converted to match arm64,
> > assuming that that is possible.
>=20
> Ah, so you are going for 6.9 too? I can give the series a try on my
> side in that case. When do you plan to apply them?

If they're to be applied, it would be Palmer, not I. And if history is
any guide, it could be into the merge window. My point though was more
that either this was acceptable for v6.9 or would be v6.10 material
with the same mechanism as arm64. Rebasing after v6.9-rc1 but not
adapting to that way of doing things is what seemed silly to me, since
if a resend is required then the other improvements should be carried
out at the same time.

Cheers,
Conor.

--4yFQMGvLloPM49wl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZd3BrQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0l+1AQD2Kv7qn0sG5InjsblGeMCFLO+iLg5s4b1JdnY/mXJAMgEAnPLESP1zEN5H
BZ6fe0suc1bctDUkHs99G3uQ759MlQc=
=9yZw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4yFQMGvLloPM49wl--