Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83241-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:36:23 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Miguel
 Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, Wedson Almeida
 Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Gary Guo
	<gary@garyguo.net>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron
	<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Paul Walmsley
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Nathan
 Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scripts: generate_rust_target: enable building on
 RISC-V
Message-ID: <20240227-swarm-serpent-2010b255f68a@wendy>
References: <20240223-leverage-walmart-5424542cd8bd@spud>
 <20240223-employee-pessimism-03ba0b58db6b@spud>
 <CANiq72ngEZskjH0f=8+cJuQsFTK227bGCxe5G0STMHuPbZYnXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240227-resolved-deceit-4a59a6af5b71@wendy>
 <CANiq72mwM+4Oh-H5WmRoqQ_nE1w-eJ1wn-nEwS=BR9JRwzxMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240227-glove-underwire-f562a56cf2c7@wendy>
 <CANiq72=f03_bw9B8ww8UxHkVyP2F7ZPyvC+KWCyhO3Nk1yqdaw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lgqlciDgvTDbCOgO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=f03_bw9B8ww8UxHkVyP2F7ZPyvC+KWCyhO3Nk1yqdaw@mail.gmail.com>

--lgqlciDgvTDbCOgO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:12:51PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:05=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley
> <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
> >
> > My point though was more
> > that either this was acceptable for v6.9 or would be v6.10 material
> > with the same mechanism as arm64. Rebasing after v6.9-rc1 but not
> > adapting to that way of doing things is what seemed silly to me, since
> > if a resend is required then the other improvements should be carried
> > out at the same time.
>=20
> If avoiding the `target.json` is possible, definitely.
>=20
> I didn't want to assume it is, though -- e.g. the native integer
> widths you have is 64 but the built-in targets use 32:64 (perhaps
> there is a way to tweak it with an LLVM param via `-Cllvm-args`, but I
> don't see any obvious way from a quick look; `opt` does have it,
> though).

Looking closer at those targets, all of them enable compressed
instructors, but we support hardware that does not support them.
I think that means we are stuck with the custom targets.

I could badger Palmer to pick this up tomorrow, provided you're okay
with the gist of this series.

Cheers,
Conor.

--lgqlciDgvTDbCOgO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZd3XRwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0pwnAQDKxa0TynZPieVRztR0zcy3tmhfLcVSi9lF1+smiaRObwD/S98C/1BHyqaa
o69/XjNcE1BNOR9mwoXX9xRD9UA01Qc=
=I1HU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lgqlciDgvTDbCOgO--