Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756666AbYABSe5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:34:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754523AbYABSeq (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:34:46 -0500 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:34280 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755877AbYABSep (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:34:45 -0500 Message-ID: <477BDE0C.8040302@tmr.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:55:08 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso , Nigel Cunningham , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , "The place to get help!" , suspend2-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, LKML Subject: Re: Freezing filesystems (Was Re: What's in store for 2008 for TuxOnIce?) References: <477AC060.5040004@nigel.suspend2.net> <200801020021.37259.rjw@sisk.pl> <477AD2AA.4070707@nigel.suspend2.net> <20080102010325.GC13288@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080102010325.GC13288@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1791 Lines: 38 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to >>> one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that >>> due to the much lower traffic. >> I guess that makes sense. I guess people can always be referred to LKML >> for the issues where the appropriate person isn't on linux-pm. > > Hi Nigel, > > I'd really recommend pushing the TuxOnIce discussions to LKML. That > way people can see the size of the user community and Andrew and Linus > can see how many people are using TuxOnIce. They can also see how > well the TuxOnIce community helps address user problems, which is a > big consideration when Linus decides whether or not to merge a > particular technology. > > If the goal is eventual merger of TuxOnIce, LKML is really the best > place to have the discussions. Examples such as Realtime, CFS, and > others have shown that you really want to keep the discussion front > and center. When one developer says, "not my problem; my code is > perfect", and the other developer is working with users who report > problems, guess which technology generally ends up getting merged by > Linus? > Judging from the fact that TuxOnIce is still excluded, I would say the answer is obvious. :-( Posession is nine points of the law... -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/