Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83669-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Charles
 Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>, kernel@pengutronix.de, Shawn Guo
 <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, Richard Fitzgerald
 <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Maxime
 Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Fabio
 Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Gregory Clement
 <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] irqchip: Convert to platform remove callback
 returning void
In-Reply-To: <knhwqxhouaiehmnnz5oxaxibhq7usokefztae4pplqypwuzgye@mke2irokres4>
References: <cover.1703284359.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
 <knhwqxhouaiehmnnz5oxaxibhq7usokefztae4pplqypwuzgye@mke2irokres4>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:03:07 +0100
Message-ID: <874jdtalh0.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 15 2024 at 22:03, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:50:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote:
>> this series converts all drivers below drivers/irqchip to use
>> .remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a remove
>> callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the
>> eventual goal. The TL;DR; is to make it harder for driver authors to
>> leak resources.
>>=20
>> The drivers touched here are all fine though and don't return early in
>> .remove(). So all conversions in this series are trivial.
>
> I'm still waiting for this series to go in (or get review feedback). Is
> this still on your radar? You're the right maintainer to take this
> series, aren't you?

I am and it fell through my christmas crack. I don't even try to catch
up with email after being almost 3 weeks AFK. For two decades I rely on
submitters to ping me after a couple of weeks or month in this case :)

Thanks,

        tglx