Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758756AbYABTwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754692AbYABTwG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:52:06 -0500 Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.40]:33385 "EHLO smtp6.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754383AbYABTwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:52:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 21:51:46 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Message-ID: <20080102195146.GB15898@does.not.exist> References: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist> <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1831 Lines: 53 On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:41:57AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jan 02, 2008 03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, > > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel > > offered it - and that's definitely not intended. > > > > Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the > > trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY > > > > config EXT4DEV_FS > > tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > + depends on BROKEN > > select JBD2 > > select CRC16 > > help > > Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough? Most people and all distributions use CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y simply because too many options (including options required for hardware support) depend on it. Compare e.g.: - "Marvell SATA support (HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL)" - "Provide NFSv4 client support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" And I really do not have the impression that ext4 is ready for being used by people who cannot remove this depends line from a Kconfig file in their kernel. > Cheers, Andreas cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/