Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:40:34 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN
Message-ID: <20080102204034.703ebdd3@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int>
References: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist>
	<20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street,
 Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a
 Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1188
Lines: 32

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:41:57 -0700
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> wrote:

> On Jan 02, 2008  03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, 
> > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel 
> > offered it - and that's definitely not intended.
> > 
> > Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the 
> > trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> > 
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY
> >  
> >  config EXT4DEV_FS
> >  	tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> > +	depends on BROKEN
> >  	select JBD2
> >  	select CRC16
> >  	help
> 
> Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough?

Of course it is - Adrian is however trying to remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
and reality is getting in his way again 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/