Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758439AbYABV3o (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:29:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753697AbYABV3f (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:29:35 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:47942 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753291AbYABV3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:29:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20071112143009.425807965@de.ibm.com> <20071112144009.831296895@de.ibm.com> <20080102204435.GB15460@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:28:54 +1100 Message-Id: <1199309334.6751.30.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 673 Lines: 18 > > Can we please just nuke CONFIG_HIGHPTE? There's only been a small > > amount of 32bit machines with so much memory that they'd need it > > and they can happily stay on the currently supported enterprise > > distro releases instead of dragging this cruft around forever. > > And all MMU-equipped FR-V machines with more than 256 MiB of RAM, > according to arch/frv/Kconfig? ppc32 uses that too when highmem is on. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/