Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758552AbYABVvx (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:51:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754388AbYABVvm (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:51:42 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]:17100 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755709AbYABVvk (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:51:40 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=bj3leOX0benU/rMc8z9SXA/90I4h7Vf+SrxfnbVED4kTqg/p/4oLbcCnRbhkpFxUWuxyQDP3otnj7ch7gwn7ShlFapFaHx7w9vFmwCEmQAJyQ3u0YgORc36aGs2Mp44JDU6b8sdniG9yANLNJaqfnP1Q5CoQ09j5Z8R+aAj+W9Q= Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN From: Eric Anopolsky To: Adrian Bunk Cc: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080102195146.GB15898@does.not.exist> References: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist> <20080102174157.GD3351@webber.adilger.int> <20080102195146.GB15898@does.not.exist> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XMu64o54CM2SRP122olD" Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:51:32 -0800 Message-Id: <1199310692.5786.53.camel@dione> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1513 Lines: 45 --=-XMu64o54CM2SRP122olD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough? >=20 > Most people and all distributions use CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=3Dy simply=20 > because too many options (including options required for hardware=20 > support) depend on it. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think most people use the distro-provided precompiled kernels. This is only a danger to people who insist on compiling their own kernels but who don't know enough to investigate things labeled "EXPERIMENTAL" before typing Y. IMHO, these people are a dying breed since modern distros seem to do a good job at preventing problems that drive ordinary users to compile their own kernels in the first place. IMHO, it's reasonable to expect the small minority of Linux users who want to compile their own kernels to learn that "EXPERIMENTAL" means something. Cheers, Eric --=-XMu64o54CM2SRP122olD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHfAdke2L37HVup3ARArSqAKDg09++/R8jwUIWZlL7fxBKUnWspwCeLiUY ht/3UcAfTENpr7My3h+Mmk0= =Z7oK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XMu64o54CM2SRP122olD-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/