Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <07e80d55-d766-1781-ffc9-fab9ddcd33e3@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:32:48 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB:UAS:return ENODEV when submit urbs fail with
 device not attached.
Content-Language: en-US
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net>
CC: <WeitaoWang@zhaoxin.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20240228111521.3864-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>
 <e8c4e8a3-bfc3-463f-afce-b9f600b588b2@suse.com>
From: "WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com" <WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>
In-Reply-To: <e8c4e8a3-bfc3-463f-afce-b9f600b588b2@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2024/2/28 16:00, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
>> @@ -562,9 +561,9 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
>>
>>       lockdep_assert_held(&devinfo->lock);
>>       if (cmdinfo->state & SUBMIT_STATUS_URB) {
>> -             urb = uas_submit_sense_urb(cmnd, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> -             if (!urb)
>> -                     return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
>> +             err = uas_submit_sense_urb(cmnd, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +             if (err)
>> +                     return (err == -ENODEV) ? -ENODEV : SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
> 
> Either we ought to use SCSI error codes or generic error codes.
> There is no need to translate all but one error condition here.
> 

  static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
@@ -562,10 +561,13 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,

  	lockdep_assert_held(&devinfo->lock);
  	if (cmdinfo->state & SUBMIT_STATUS_URB) {
-		urb = uas_submit_sense_urb(cmnd, GFP_ATOMIC);
-		if (!urb)
+		err = uas_submit_sense_urb(cmnd, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!err)
+			cmdinfo->state &= ~SUBMIT_STATUS_URB;
+		else if (err == -ENODEV)
+			return -ENODEV;
+		else
  			return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
-		cmdinfo->state &= ~SUBMIT_STATUS_URB;
  	}

  	if (cmdinfo->state & ALLOC_DATA_IN_URB) {
@@ -582,6 +584,8 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
  		if (err) {
  			usb_unanchor_urb(cmdinfo->data_in_urb);
  			uas_log_cmd_state(cmnd, "data in submit err", err);
+			if (err == -ENODEV)
+				return -ENODEV;
  			return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
  		}
  		cmdinfo->state &= ~SUBMIT_DATA_IN_URB;
@@ -602,6 +606,8 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
  		if (err) {
  			usb_unanchor_urb(cmdinfo->data_out_urb);
  			uas_log_cmd_state(cmnd, "data out submit err", err);
+			if (err == -ENODEV)
+				return -ENODEV;
  			return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
  		}
  		cmdinfo->state &= ~SUBMIT_DATA_OUT_URB;
@@ -621,6 +627,8 @@ static int uas_submit_urbs(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
  		if (err) {
  			usb_unanchor_urb(cmdinfo->cmd_urb);
  			uas_log_cmd_state(cmnd, "cmd submit err", err);
+			if (err == -ENODEV)
+				return -ENODEV;
  			return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
  		}

I'm not sure I fully understand what your mean.
Whether the above code is more reasonable? If not,could you give me some
suggestion? Thanks for your help!

Weitao