Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp2662233rbb; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCXuQ/10h/ahT2jVFiQzkJBcxd6fRyJgp8oFkxQRnGZRVzD0OMzVDjqAaLBf6OQX0r33nSCD5G2uAMRTpcmXw9R0hbxNPCq/FmS803SUEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAXUQaZDOKQaeG06cIDGvF+DdySwxolGS/8KZo8aAorLzDHZb4JQjDH8tzYWB/ouAiPPCo X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e52:0:b0:42e:6100:8bc9 with SMTP id i18-20020ac85e52000000b0042e61008bc9mr14875163qtx.1.1709138367680; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709138367; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uJ48G3d+9MuwZx9C7a/9eQnryymdVo14SnBzeqHB1MzmObP6ZEs/MKAcWgmBN2kBge 1zgST43WOVffXghoALn32/EmwsF9lu9AgwntZ4zeCaz4Mb0wd6N6jBf0voUHZXcW6B5F JyovWyqSM17mhs4/Zq0EYoF470mW4MjcdsNihEhyAp1LgNFqxItCW9MSyrB8cIfSPEm0 amKHvtzSaLQN383DgLB3kc7YKx+f5NleREc8r5ZJy2wNHuP4ocLzPFT+IoPjHMVuD07X sDZtuqkl+RTd8RORzWYmx2V3qjm8ddrMXxR+NrStbeFdkLAwCcUNh6HJI3fnMTBYz6w3 ADtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=jTwj7YTldw7xXwxIUCBnkzOCQU6UVFcauswdy14IwOs=; fh=+K2YHTt4YYx2eNtzHhXBSC4uOLr4I63su7ZZdKZTFGs=; b=FvDDHkRw72ciMeKJmrRCsZzj+JEHepOgeQN5XrcPJPI67hZ6iGF+hAwdWFY563NEys BaKf1y/EnbFlDs26PBCOgFXur+r6uJya8ig3pC6FovYJc3EF9V4DELEF6/n7y01DgmWN oBx6EEhsaqgZeOFNG/6dDe7Y7zafySzW2vRMfFUgznMhWbVirAmBOYrb98j9B8S1ZS/o 5Gk0vh++bS3ujNl1tMyHroQxs9jLSPVFzW3GwNWeOvuWuLMlw3SHwEhxZ+AculP5fy4l ZY6gWu4yvGHm0avrQVhknklnNxSDVkUvBuqDikxpoWHx4yyXGjcqBlKWjfOKwxOEw9Ck mxQA==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=H1YNkssN; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85377-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-85377-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u6-20020a05622a198600b0042e9a0f16f1si4246976qtc.292.2024.02.28.08.39.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85377-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=H1YNkssN; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85377-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-85377-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609DC1C21B43 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A93A3FBB4; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="H1YNkssN" Received: from mail-yw1-f171.google.com (mail-yw1-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0273A1E514; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709138335; cv=none; b=qB5sIVYyIdzFG69/tOC8FkKLrb4ajrEJxa8KRr146MKWsDgFdLpk0IXDh6UXQ1zycJameiZv9ex4stKI2oApguXkYHZr7++F0Pc0g+IUEb6ULkNq61XinJUb1zwzBqJ6kjT1r5KT3hiUDJ4LS2/I3um+9VdRzkhHMPrLzW1Osbo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709138335; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y5V4yf+OL0T4yXvoaoiubpwk4H7Ml9DAq0xONX7D8YE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ReBws46EZuvwnmEvBQxwg00R2gXp3Iw2pXcQHPrF3s1+0eE2Oi3nLpLOur9lsIYcIbZSK6IvciJEBXAEMXT2e6qOUSSSH3C62aUnvK5OyaJ+IUcnmNchOfdC1qNlIyHALWZ7Kz5goQ9cHl7cl2Tac90IyB4TTEG9F1c0639wNKk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=H1YNkssN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-yw1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-608ccac1899so53891107b3.1; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:38:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709138331; x=1709743131; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jTwj7YTldw7xXwxIUCBnkzOCQU6UVFcauswdy14IwOs=; b=H1YNkssNOo1yu/1vcIcK80aG7rNgNWzr+9mPF7ktCXckf7hJrgJPLXfRuGGpNT0qzG WwMZT9FI8llnsH+fXMLR0fnw6v+B9tJS9IUcBTHnS+qjGLkai49u54kfEfEfiUVBrLec qEJiWdvljcoMCM8CvFyJ5wNzoVEQXXB2f4ASvQ23X5lp64LtNq9OKcAZTGVpDGKqwUCf bdk0MqREcIz6tsakAEVJ6nL8JgZA6ZHBJRNVavDFsm7KvEvraF4Uu6Ar7nPYmUwOWi9A 43IVmQlolZ1WpGSzySwk4bK5rox9co6DbIpnWTwmPF9OC82LZ8ril1weKzYf2jEYrg5g rhtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709138331; x=1709743131; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jTwj7YTldw7xXwxIUCBnkzOCQU6UVFcauswdy14IwOs=; b=NB4G+qG/N9QoHgnCtyim2m9MEwBjL549hlshANnRzOOkbMObByvZ0Swsd/zVIyyoIf 4uAr/kRLoKqlGFujep+WCpWZWHb0q1O4hTpHQK0zjprKw8KVFC/T3O3oanaxzFZo9S+g oE5c1wNs3SmiFUQmXeP2znkFdtlsF/WNlZyMfo+zzAYBLtesgv7MXDJV2eArDswwXghH 2+gXwMjTn3qCkmOXuvSKq2oH9xidvS27Afvps87W9Yg4KeCPIvAbHr2nCU70asC5EUlr Q+NWq4Qs4CiguSoBlaN9151pISg5EaNYRnBQijuuQlZ4xp7DTsL3mqHhIQbYXkN54WIs Dg7A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUTnXBeGT87cF6zYM30XnLrOjlQnAHd/2OhYrNrePfHWo5xyEm18QRqGl/CP3Tv4Fasi1/yHWQa1/pTxhJnwn1e8u7Bt8GS0GdNKFvEbox3loQpeszw26fisl6ryd2+h+juigZhQJl+CXp6hw5/qfgxIdEqnd+UTIdOXQnqbbj9Q/mmuDQze2w5m6yc/rWY+YZzsr8saXOEFmOzPMmM X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yys2wk+DYsLAlUA/2ZgAisd3qKrXUIbm45u/81zAbJKsNsL83jf Q3LUPwU/g2R75nu0g7HI3/rZ4neDMHyyCd6xJxfDRqItmZ1Gr0Bo X-Received: by 2002:a81:e349:0:b0:608:d188:6fd9 with SMTP id w9-20020a81e349000000b00608d1886fd9mr5562117ywl.33.1709138330762; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:38:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2601:344:8301:57f0:2256:57ae:919c:373f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y130-20020a0dd688000000b00608a174f00fsm2468913ywd.55.2024.02.28.08.38.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:38:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:38:49 -0800 From: Yury Norov To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Michal Swiatkowski , Marcin Szycik , Wojciech Drewek , Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexander Potapenko , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Przemek Kitszel , Simon Horman , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 17/21] lib/bitmap: add tests for IP tunnel flags conversion helpers Message-ID: References: <20240201122216.2634007-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> <20240201122216.2634007-18-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240201122216.2634007-18-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > Now that there are helpers for converting IP tunnel flags between the > old __be16 format and the bitmap format, make sure they work as expected > by adding a couple of tests to the bitmap testing suite. The helpers are > all inline, so no dependencies on the related CONFIG_* (or a standalone > module) are needed. > > Cover three possible cases: > > 1. No bits past BIT(15) are set, VTI/SIT bits are not set. This > conversion is almost a direct assignment. > 2. No bits past BIT(15) are set, but VTI/SIT bit is set. During the > conversion, it must be transformed into BIT(16) in the bitmap, > but still compatible with the __be16 format. > 3. The bitmap has bits past BIT(15) set (not the VTI/SIT one). The > result will be truncated. > Note that currently __IP_TUNNEL_FLAG_NUM is 17 (incl. special), > which means that the result of this case is currently > semi-false-positive. When BIT(17) is finally here, it will be > adjusted accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin So why testing IP tunnels stuff in lib/test_bitmap? I think it should go with the rest of networking code. > --- > lib/test_bitmap.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c > index 4ee1f8ceb51d..270afc0cba5c 100644 > --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c > +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ > #include > #include > > +#include > + > #include "../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_module.h" > > #define EXP1_IN_BITS (sizeof(exp1) * 8) > @@ -1409,6 +1411,108 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_write_perf(void) > > #undef TEST_BIT_LEN > > +struct ip_tunnel_flags_test { > + const u16 *src_bits; > + const u16 *exp_bits; > + u8 src_num; > + u8 exp_num; > + __be16 exp_val; > + bool exp_comp:1; > +}; > + > +#define IP_TUNNEL_FLAGS_TEST(src, comp, eval, exp) { \ > + .src_bits = (src), \ > + .src_num = ARRAY_SIZE(src), \ > + .exp_comp = (comp), \ > + .exp_val = (eval), \ > + .exp_bits = (exp), \ > + .exp_num = ARRAY_SIZE(exp), \ > +} > + > +/* These are __be16-compatible and can be compared as is */ > +static const u16 ip_tunnel_flags_1[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_KEY_BIT, > + IP_TUNNEL_STRICT_BIT, > + IP_TUNNEL_ERSPAN_OPT_BIT, > +}; > + > +/* > + * Due to the previous flags design limitation, setting either > + * ``IP_TUNNEL_CSUM_BIT`` (on Big Endian) or ``IP_TUNNEL_DONT_FRAGMENT_BIT`` > + * (on Little) also sets VTI/ISATAP bit. In the bitmap implementation, they > + * correspond to ``BIT(16)``, which is bigger than ``U16_MAX``, but still is > + * backward-compatible. > + */ > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN > +#define IP_TUNNEL_CONFLICT_BIT IP_TUNNEL_CSUM_BIT > +#else > +#define IP_TUNNEL_CONFLICT_BIT IP_TUNNEL_DONT_FRAGMENT_BIT > +#endif > + > +static const u16 ip_tunnel_flags_2_src[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_CONFLICT_BIT, > +}; > + > +static const u16 ip_tunnel_flags_2_exp[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_CONFLICT_BIT, > + IP_TUNNEL_SIT_ISATAP_BIT, > +}; > + > +/* Bits 17 and higher are not compatible with __be16 flags */ > +static const u16 ip_tunnel_flags_3_src[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_VXLAN_OPT_BIT, > + 17, > + 18, > + 20, > +}; > + > +static const u16 ip_tunnel_flags_3_exp[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_VXLAN_OPT_BIT, > +}; > + > +static const struct ip_tunnel_flags_test ip_tunnel_flags_test[] __initconst = { > + IP_TUNNEL_FLAGS_TEST(ip_tunnel_flags_1, true, > + cpu_to_be16(BIT(IP_TUNNEL_KEY_BIT) | > + BIT(IP_TUNNEL_STRICT_BIT) | > + BIT(IP_TUNNEL_ERSPAN_OPT_BIT)), > + ip_tunnel_flags_1), > + IP_TUNNEL_FLAGS_TEST(ip_tunnel_flags_2_src, true, VTI_ISVTI, > + ip_tunnel_flags_2_exp), > + IP_TUNNEL_FLAGS_TEST(ip_tunnel_flags_3_src, > + /* > + * This must be set to ``false`` once > + * ``__IP_TUNNEL_FLAG_NUM`` goes above 17. > + */ > + true, > + cpu_to_be16(BIT(IP_TUNNEL_VXLAN_OPT_BIT)), > + ip_tunnel_flags_3_exp), > +}; > + > +static void __init test_ip_tunnel_flags(void) > +{ > + for (u32 i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ip_tunnel_flags_test); i++) { > + typeof(*ip_tunnel_flags_test) *test = &ip_tunnel_flags_test[i]; > + IP_TUNNEL_DECLARE_FLAGS(src) = { }; > + IP_TUNNEL_DECLARE_FLAGS(exp) = { }; > + IP_TUNNEL_DECLARE_FLAGS(out); > + > + for (u32 j = 0; j < test->src_num; j++) > + __set_bit(test->src_bits[j], src); > + > + for (u32 j = 0; j < test->exp_num; j++) > + __set_bit(test->exp_bits[j], exp); > + > + ip_tunnel_flags_from_be16(out, test->exp_val); > + > + expect_eq_uint(test->exp_comp, > + ip_tunnel_flags_is_be16_compat(src)); > + expect_eq_uint((__force u16)test->exp_val, > + (__force u16)ip_tunnel_flags_to_be16(src)); > + > + __ipt_flag_op(expect_eq_bitmap, exp, out); > + } > +} > + > static void __init selftest(void) > { > test_zero_clear(); > @@ -1428,6 +1532,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void) > test_bitmap_read_write(); > test_bitmap_read_perf(); > test_bitmap_write_perf(); > + test_ip_tunnel_flags(); > > test_find_nth_bit(); > test_for_each_set_bit(); > -- > 2.43.0