Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282916AbSAASiM>; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:38:12 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282904AbSAASiC>; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:38:02 -0500
Received: from mail.pha.ha-vel.cz ([195.39.72.3]:42257 "HELO
	mail.pha.ha-vel.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S282998AbSAASh5>; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:37:57 -0500
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:37:48 +0100
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATA RAID-0 FYI-Did the Impossible.
Message-ID: <20020101193748.A30616@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112310558030.4280-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112310558030.4280-100000@master.linux-ide.org>; from andre@linux-ide.org on Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 06:05:57AM -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 06:05:57AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> Writing intelligently...done: 109124 kB/s  51.0 %CPU
> Reading intelligently...done: 167240 kB/s  97.6 %CPU

> If you want your system to have this kind of performance, that raise hell
> to get the patches adopted into the main kernel.

Very nice ... but impossible? I don't think so. I'd be quite interested
in hearing what problem 2.4 has that it doesn't reach the same
performance as you have shown, though. Or does it?

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/