Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-86587-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bec7c1db-c13e-4b00-a968-4ae69539d7ac@redhat.com>
 <ZdYKSkqRckOc5aRO@sashalap> <a9652aa2-e79b-4144-b3b7-746587af9eca@redhat.com>
 <ZdYSmdUKzQAYpprc@sashalap> <3ebbc121-8cb8-4b8d-ad5d-fb5c576e5171@redhat.com>
 <2024022129-expiring-resurface-146c@gregkh> <288132ea-87cf-4b56-908e-2263b6c6b67f@redhat.com>
 <2024022236-stock-wielder-fcbc@gregkh> <7be9ad00-1432-4a19-a954-32fa0f24fecd@redhat.com>
 <2024022949-uncapped-crushing-e5f9@gregkh> <2024022918-deepen-composed-c680@gregkh>
In-Reply-To: <2024022918-deepen-composed-c680@gregkh>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:53:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CABgObfaH2BHK==ZgbeajH8SxAxM51=91idrvd4n4L7UNiNQkEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52437: Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING
 in raid5d"
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cve@kernel.org, 
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:05=E2=80=AFAM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:32:03AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:31:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > So if the reply-to points to LKML + the subsystem mailing
> > > list for the maintainers + a new ML for the security folks (and these=
 three
> > > are also CC'd on the announcements, at least the last two), that woul=
d be
> > > nice to have.  I can work on patches to vulns.git, for example to int=
egrate
> > > with get_maintainer.pl, if you ack the idea.
> >
> > That might be a bit noisy, for some commits, but sure, I can see the
> > value in being notified about a CVE for my subsystem.  If you have a
> > specific 'get_maintainer.pl' command line invocation you think would be
> > good, I can easily add it to the scripts.
>
> Would:
>         --no-keywords --no-git --no-git-fallback --norolestats --nol
>
> be a good pattern to follow?

I would include lists as well. it would be nice to exclude
reviewed-bys but that's not easy to do in get_maintainer.pI

Paolo