Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-86594-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:58:37 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Pass consumer device through to core in
 devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Message-ID: <ZeBjXfKH_Wl2Giai@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240223065254.3795204-1-swboyd@chromium.org>
 <Zd-CJHkCHpuIEnWh@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAMRc=Mdapd2jTACGqm-ujZrAunRmNeJ8_3+bpsN4ieCre52yrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Zd-nI9XoYW3hrPXx@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAE-0n52cgFvaHPDLBd-cn0WMisxX41-fPJHkroTucxHNk39SZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n52cgFvaHPDLBd-cn0WMisxX41-fPJHkroTucxHNk39SZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:38:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-02-28 13:35:31)
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:28:07PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

..

> > > > Have you seen this?
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019173457.2445119-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
> > >
> > > Clearly yes as I queued the first one in that series. The rest did not
> > > make its way upstream for whatever reason. What is your point? You
> > > want to respin it?
> >
> > It was a reply to Stephen. :-)
> 
> I saw it but it hadn't gone anywhere for many months so I fixed the
> problem I saw. Will you resend it?

Yes, this is the plan, too many things are ongoing, so have had no time (yet)
to address comments and resubmit. In any case I'm not against your change, it
makes it better anyway without hacking the code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko