Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-86629-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:28:14 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
 linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fprobe: Fix to allocate entry_data_size buffer with
 rethook instances
Message-Id: <20240229202814.3ee3568bda16099e41c94569@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <170920576727.107552.638161246679734051.stgit@devnote2>
References: <170920576727.107552.638161246679734051.stgit@devnote2>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:22:47 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Fix to allocate fprobe::entry_data_size buffer with rethook instances.
> If fprobe doesn't allocate entry_data_size buffer for each rethook instance,
> fprobe entry handler can cause a buffer overrun when storing entry data in
> entry handler.
> 

Oops, missed a URL.

> Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zd9eBn2FTQzYyg7L@krava/

Thanks,

> Fixes: 4bbd93455659 ("kprobes: kretprobe scalability improvement")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c |   14 ++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index 6cd2a4e3afb8..9ff018245840 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -189,9 +189,6 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fprobe *fp, int num)
>  {
>  	int size;
>  
> -	if (num <= 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (!fp->exit_handler) {
>  		fp->rethook = NULL;
>  		return 0;
> @@ -199,15 +196,16 @@ static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fprobe *fp, int num)
>  
>  	/* Initialize rethook if needed */
>  	if (fp->nr_maxactive)
> -		size = fp->nr_maxactive;
> +		num = fp->nr_maxactive;
>  	else
> -		size = num * num_possible_cpus() * 2;
> -	if (size <= 0)
> +		num *= num_possible_cpus() * 2;
> +	if (num <= 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	size = sizeof(struct fprobe_rethook_node) + fp->entry_data_size;
> +
>  	/* Initialize rethook */
> -	fp->rethook = rethook_alloc((void *)fp, fprobe_exit_handler,
> -				sizeof(struct fprobe_rethook_node), size);
> +	fp->rethook = rethook_alloc((void *)fp, fprobe_exit_handler, size, num);
>  	if (IS_ERR(fp->rethook))
>  		return PTR_ERR(fp->rethook);
>  
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>