Received: by 2002:ab2:2997:0:b0:1ec:cbc4:63fb with SMTP id n23csp446200lqb; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:53:23 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUor5M8m5G0ErxT5qVWuHmwZApZZfIQqV/fpveZLovZqTZ0kjNVfT1eYFS2OOTPpgdtSfrznglmTJT71pj9dZOiCPR26BmhmVXwykTztQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IELjKuVlqkNJt+QMhTDuaLEKol9W6Mdqkcevk0IIoqEFsU43WnzPtpyt4rVqLEkf+TZc5Ue X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:9ce:b0:690:4942:dd89 with SMTP id dp14-20020a05621409ce00b006904942dd89mr1539122qvb.28.1709214803371; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:53:23 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5-20020a05621419c500b0068fcc76644bsi1375230qvc.99.2024.02.29.05.53.23 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-86783-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="n2VhQ/al"; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-86783-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-86783-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB391C20987 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780C412BE95; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="n2VhQ/al" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A689D7D3E9; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709214793; cv=none; b=TbkDKkblNA+vHb3wnE847Upk6AE2adwr2mFErjmoZjnGoa4Wb8OgBziIw0Qj5uv4SUUXMzZZHXxlSnwjwhVGqItkk7LFs8zklxgyTHQDAi2KXb6pcZKzxGvbVAED27CuADtZWbBS3cvKHkGK0pxhSjiG9EFdDVE30pJCJvqT+Do= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709214793; c=relaxed/simple; bh=soFEyKKUiQuYWMqoVH6cYWp/GwAL18MTf6JPCEiXDwI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hWeXvgWv1SerI7HqwEzqHjJh/8QjstEoWPnhdpxqQ63yEvynQqOgzVYskatMEbV8/XEXSxJPqFSfaTD5X3PN9EVU62baocIq2RSO8udF94pFOk9lkT4RNPr1VQx7xt0wqy1YMAcceUm+IB4NlZS+tnwwr33pNZ8Cz6bS5czKZZw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=n2VhQ/al; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709214792; x=1740750792; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=soFEyKKUiQuYWMqoVH6cYWp/GwAL18MTf6JPCEiXDwI=; b=n2VhQ/alU/f0f1i19lHLauU46xFDGthOUsyjJEi8nRNws8VP0GYbANzC bhwYIATTyrvu0/djievbOn3DXWenqQeodnwHjCeGYr72sTP6nx5I+9gDF otuhcjN5JW9IauxB6hpDKmmHBy1ahiRFWT6zJA5IHiR0xxHWl/GM2yyk6 dN/Evvm8DbtdO2gZZdjwI/WXpz2pe2yBAnx0Edc36gDkzO6TYT2mGtAPk oBUb4Po50V5ff6BjQg4M8UMkbs0Uh6BkCO6OYlmcPY29H33NXXqBswzMF U3vCEtQcbU4EsQ/IjpAxzfeVw6ZsPZ47TG+4BAdRcpjD9YrgSFePKAki/ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10998"; a="14835702" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,194,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="14835702" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2024 05:53:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10998"; a="913982643" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,194,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913982643" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2024 05:53:06 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rfgqN-00000008gQI-1TA4; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:53:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:53:03 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Th=E9o?= Lebrun Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Linus Walleij , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Philipp Zabel , Vladimir Kondratiev , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Tawfik Bayouk , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/10] reset: eyeq5: add platform driver Message-ID: References: <20240227-mbly-clk-v8-0-c57fbda7664a@bootlin.com> <20240227-mbly-clk-v8-4-c57fbda7664a@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 03:48:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:18:08PM +0100, Th?o Lebrun wrote: .. > The downside is that you will need to include property.h for this only thing. > And I don't see other code that can be converted to fwnode right away here. I meant here device_set_node(..., dev_fwnode(parent)); On the second thought it can survive probably without it in a form device_set_node(..., of_fwnode_handle(parent->of_node)); but this does not fully solve the fundamental problem with accessing of_node. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko