Received: by 2002:a05:7208:9594:b0:7e:5202:c8b4 with SMTP id gs20csp2352917rbb; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:28:34 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVpe/s8rnGOxbbyRrUKDFk4Y1RaXBAdrKnfNgC7gIaih7I5S/jJLh51VzwB3fzNNN6UN1PA+HuzPyMko7FgJRm9rSPv/vAXPX0cohpaPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEylvjWcmSuPkG30ivmufuc/xtr9CwnFIBMB+AEIWQl+N7A24GGY9js3RWQJiIgWu5grInq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3443:b0:6e2:ebfd:4b26 with SMTP id b3-20020a056830344300b006e2ebfd4b26mr14254576otu.20.1709098114387; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:28:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q10-20020a63d60a000000b005dc41faf522si6747904pgg.790.2024.02.27.21.28.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-84534-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=OmtQqTgn; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-84534-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-84534-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=REJECT) header.from=google.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A100B21C88 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDBE210ED; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="OmtQqTgn" Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29CD20DEB for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709097895; cv=none; b=tP9rMi+UudlDkow9y1V8FjqoJxrLBAXc8Ezx1kq3usAXm3t4eFoZhxq76D6VrEjA9/Q5GfzYNjCgdYrh93B/7qC3d7IksAcs235QS1Q7lI+0lLr6v5yYEC/dD1fTs/jj773+xu5I9k3EBkvMztv0mB2fXIc4LC6Y5C1rU/9DRO8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709097895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ESQJ57fYEZ+NajWcMze9DsgiUSoti8Bgg/3xdShO4Sk=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=r6Bynn50RZQc1iv4wxrCo8F8ybnvc4+fTC4l0sRZQhibshaCGp9nV6fcIc+VrCBeFOr29VfVLMSmqkwIn0X2+9kEWPdOtB5GQsYC7ndz833QAHOpeQfFlZ02SCg5VFy+gFsn+W3vcSMq22lsAvWrUpwG/o0uayozd2RO6S1IIjI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=OmtQqTgn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5664e580cb7so8003a12.0 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:24:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1709097892; x=1709702692; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ESQJ57fYEZ+NajWcMze9DsgiUSoti8Bgg/3xdShO4Sk=; b=OmtQqTgnQgA2Ti9QADTxu4XPgBrNNd8l9QBCWvtN0Pm41fcml8TQa2yfo23K/zDnXD 9yF2I7sto5QIyZuOab2Uxk4DCl6P+5mQgtX56PwFuvsGpEWKCujp6psafbjpWCtIEdi5 1N9fsS2dbO4nWMWrmksgSZBO9q6Z5/H8tFPUYLuVrUM5oRXCmJ5Oc4HCGHs+BfL/VB21 OZvB7PDnw1hdEPD3mz1n9d5yIt/QD7bxwOHtWDiFZZOyqOUEmQvKJRo1EiclzaeyrF5a STb0q2ROhmy9hh5K6wL/34lPwoG2DAwuzZm/iiH4OnVXOyLnrgxHxmpVyU03bBF7aNTa dfaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709097892; x=1709702692; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ESQJ57fYEZ+NajWcMze9DsgiUSoti8Bgg/3xdShO4Sk=; b=F3OlIFfJ0b7bXmX9Se0WThimUrEliCh3zQz6MVNS8ziJ6zf58XB2n9oV5SWBxrgPRd L/4NHDzid15kJd7FQ9z9iKFExUTWXNJYA4fb1i0GUa63xyXNvPuWcsGF0lVEYWG1TMdZ PtBhN4nr+LgpkXJf6yU6XGEYSDDpnbxrtA8DmAxuGSsH2ltsDr7Nu0dO43TMngFInwwp depwAupyDz0A27WUCVi6vD1d8/iJ6PKcETMbfgYR7EObeFo36G35zw4euCBSBlirlog+ JI8ff1bw3c8pwUKlU46TQOqeEEfF2S9DCb3ii9qahUQUteT09a3lapLXMHWKYrNA8tvl +BCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy2Lo9rwRt84KQUpPlZTo2xwNjcFgc4Y+GUKkDTzTyENB1K4cmc /Ls54rrSY8XfX/hJUvI9dqdEd2pQ3X1PWRXH8pigiYTCP7/qFVuXpnOGs/I3eHEElyaELnqjgW6 Y4Wj0AD4QV8ELTVTIcyJMIHqGEtmvb7QNFic= X-Received: by 2002:a50:d70b:0:b0:566:306:22b7 with SMTP id t11-20020a50d70b000000b00566030622b7mr2722edi.1.1709097892004; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:24:52 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240224001153.2584030-1-jstultz@google.com> <3937e057-6b47-77fe-9440-ade079ee2cfe@amd.com> <0c606d04-6765-d55d-61ec-c3625daea423@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <0c606d04-6765-d55d-61ec-c3625daea423@amd.com> From: John Stultz Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:24:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v8 0/7] Preparatory changes for Proxy Execution v8 To: K Prateek Nayak Cc: LKML , Joel Fernandes , Qais Yousef , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Valentin Schneider , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Zimuzo Ezeozue , Youssef Esmat , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , "Paul E. McKenney" , Metin Kaya , Xuewen Yan , Thomas Gleixner , kernel-team@android.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:12=E2=80=AFPM K Prateek Nayak wrote: > On 2/28/2024 10:21 AM, John Stultz wrote: > > Just to clarify: by "this series" did you test just the 7 preparatory > > patches submitted to the list here, or did you pull the full > > proxy-exec-v8-6.8-rc3 set from git? > > Just these preparatory patches for now. On my way to queue a run for the > whole set from your tree. I'll use the "proxy-exec-v8-6.8-rc3" branch and > pick the commits past the > "[ANNOTATION] =3D=3D=3D Proxy Exec patches past this point =3D=3D=3D" til= l the commit > ff90fb583a81 ("FIX: Avoid using possibly uninitialized cpu value with > activate_blocked_entities()") on top of the tip:sched/core mentioned > above since it'll allow me to reuse the baseline numbers :) > Ah, thank you for the clarification! Also, I really appreciate your testing with the rest of the series as well. It will be good to have any potential problems identified early (I'm trying to get v9 ready as soon as I can here, as its fixed a number of smaller issues - However, I've also managed to uncover some new problems in stress testing, so we'll see how quickly I can chase those down). thanks -john