Received: by 2002:ab2:3141:0:b0:1ed:23cc:44d1 with SMTP id i1csp216461lqg; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXJdOqe91jAbKCi0W6FgnB/f/K6As9sLHWPPrjwBVA/HVI2XDGXMnY4IEN2a9EfjAB5dbfXzWdb7voMGBoq2EvlTT9WF2zwtJH69t96pA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGT12e6I+M8mNZsT6nbv7tN6fpQHRCx9jshaGUZ+LzK4xeYVjeRY19xw7Nc5Mm/gn09iwg6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5fcd:b0:a3e:feee:3a5b with SMTP id k13-20020a1709065fcd00b00a3efeee3a5bmr1323767ejv.3.1709291414442; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gn28-20020a1709070d1c00b00a43569cfe67si1342387ejc.1025.2024.03.01.03.10.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-88298-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=TbFKmpd4; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-88298-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-88298-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092A11F224F3 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD786CDA2; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TbFKmpd4" Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com (mail-wm1-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CFBD6BFC9 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709291401; cv=none; b=Sypj9bUhraZG1YGkft5fHIoTSXZelUYzb5JRPfiZX/dT5CaNQ/H0JIEJ7jennwXBTMHSpBM8jIVKvVEtGyEkeorvsBDkniw86umk5+OY/p3+v2JcCa+G6giSkOuuf7gQEURvxBpAb6AILmadrfyZGFNdoyN4nDxzi995Qoo6tFw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709291401; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NL0X0BOz7ZVywJyCc8r0y4XYQQ5/b+5FbeyYJW/2ZGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CmiTcpc10ZG68EMACXkMYnre6mc6wOS0/Q+slAcPxFbsAGsxwbyLUS/vBtPo1pj4T8BS1tQqHYF5SpFH6Sp1TNc9SwUgiar+/ZXXFuPMqcY5O5xDmpIrWJLOkUPBJxGJj/UrGYLdnKW2xplYPKG+31dcVcFI/Yqq5d9iBXr9R/8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TbFKmpd4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-412a9e9c776so18625105e9.0 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 03:09:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709291397; x=1709896197; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PRfa5V1eCtQKvE35o3iYx+TIdATo30V6vBwFI6v4hE8=; b=TbFKmpd4+yaZTeo1bSuDisQWTqe7TJoUlSZeQ901Mc12vtk4b9UvMUypBBQZxOG28P uQuKIKQOl1RvI3kHa9QDez1jo8HF1CX58MBRJJWIyLI41QACZKi+wWuKrPtY/kI3Puso uofkgtS66ATQEZNkF4nlPcoq72O16E9aH/CH3Dms6L3fsE5IKkY6RnwCz9klYXUOB5JM mSmYx5UrM0Sw/JMjywxMN8X0hTiHMNvSK2ffvuJrCVPboQgM9X6EmBeDgYf5BpebWlHQ 1epxAKhEOTH1vHaIMFctj2OCUIGpW5EhpYy/hItt4c9Xmw57xjVV/TcA5L13Y10NpB0w nmKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709291397; x=1709896197; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PRfa5V1eCtQKvE35o3iYx+TIdATo30V6vBwFI6v4hE8=; b=mzpZBbkdeZTQXeMYvjMdffjlnhwEg+h5GRS3SduqVksHCzgul9WV0Me6gpdajR3uJc HTFqjwF8a4JFmvPidLXRq6d6nBVO4BmpmErXvu/lA4uK2OmdPhxfVwL/qN5las+yEB2B rBVDK5ImZKBFpEbFudk2m1ON/9fO/UyzUyJUemXGde5y300hUQiFybhVRqxINzwVdc7J KPoVHznYafL8p7ieKXT7n+I8gAk9y90jUfAvonSHtf8pnNYI7xPPQZWDdYVu0MlmzHPQ S3TgrlRI0iZ21vCbIlO6gh0h65L9P5gFyub6FXVlEdgxF+QgRkyXwh8LCDowlKbf6/91 V1yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1Jf1AeXsMFlfV75OcUu4xQmDMnRoWavBWKPczqNfT5v16sy7S IfiTcdG+BBHkbR5zNBerz2qDd5o3SHSY55+ptlINOXXHl39Gliva0EPa9/1E8qM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c28:b0:412:b6a7:ecf1 with SMTP id j40-20020a05600c1c2800b00412b6a7ecf1mr1507519wms.0.1709291397207; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 03:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from kepler.redhat.com (1F2EF13F.nat.pool.telekom.hu. [31.46.241.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20-20020a05600c4e1400b00412cad66f8fsm490264wmq.44.2024.03.01.03.09.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 03:09:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: Ingo Molnar From: Ingo Molnar To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Linus Torvalds , Valentin Schneider Subject: [PATCH 1/7] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 12:09:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20240301110951.3707367-2-mingo@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20240301110951.3707367-1-mingo@kernel.org> References: <20240301110951.3707367-1-mingo@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The 'balancing' spinlock added in: 08c183f31bdb ("[PATCH] sched: add option to serialize load balancing") .. is taken when the SD_SERIALIZE flag is set in a domain, but in reality it is a glorified global atomic flag serializing the load-balancing of those domains. It doesn't have any explicit locking semantics per se: we just spin_trylock() it. Turn it into a ... global atomic flag. This makes it more clear what is going on here, and reduces overhead and code size a bit: # kernel/sched/fair.o: [x86-64 defconfig] text data bss dec hex filename 60730 2721 104 63555 f843 fair.o.before 60718 2721 104 63543 f837 fair.o.after Also document the flag a bit. No change in functionality intended. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Valentin Schneider --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 6a16129f9a5c..64ae3d8dc93b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -11633,7 +11633,20 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) return 0; } -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing); +/* + * This flag serializes load-balancing passes over large domains + * (such as SD_NUMA) - only once load-balancing instance may run + * at a time, to reduce overhead on very large systems with lots + * of CPUs and large NUMA distances. + * + * - Note that load-balancing passes triggered while another one + * is executing are skipped and not re-tried. + * + * - Also note that this does not serialize sched_balance_domains() + * execution, as non-SD_SERIALIZE domains will still be + * load-balanced in parallel. + */ +static atomic_t sched_balance_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0); /* * Scale the max load_balance interval with the number of CPUs in the system. @@ -11711,7 +11724,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE; if (need_serialize) { - if (!spin_trylock(&balancing)) + if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1)) goto out; } @@ -11729,7 +11742,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy); } if (need_serialize) - spin_unlock(&balancing); + atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0); out: if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) { next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval; -- 2.40.1