To: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus
References: <adak5mqu5i8.fsf@cisco.com>
	<1199385590.7561.11.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov>
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:56:54 -0800
In-Reply-To: <1199385590.7561.11.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov> (David Dillow's message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:39:50 -0500")
Message-ID: <adafxxeu495.fsf@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.20 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 782
Lines: 16

 > If we've got time before 2.6.24 final, I'd wait on this a bit.
 > ib_srp:srp_remove_work() has them reversed as well, and I'm currently
 > tracking down why it oopses when the srp_remove_host() happens before
 > the scsi_remove_host(), which is the documented call sequence.

I think the best thing to do is to merge this (assuming that Linus
gets to it), since it looks quite safe and definitely fixes a crash.
Then if we get to the root cause we can change the order of the calls
if it turns out a different fix is required.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/