Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753956AbYACTeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:34:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751956AbYACTeO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:34:14 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:30932 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751435AbYACTeN (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:34:13 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,240,1196668800"; d="scan'208";a="248479847" Message-ID: <477D3889.9070301@intel.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:33:29 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaohua Li CC: lkml , linux-pci , Greg KH , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Subject: Re: [RFC] PCIE ASPM support References: <1199340944.1642.26.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1199340944.1642.26.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2008 19:34:12.0304 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E22B500:01C84E3F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2110 Lines: 50 Shaohua Li wrote: > PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0 > state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state > and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This > capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power reduction > beyond what is achievable by software-only controlled power management. > However, The device should be configured by software appropriately. > Enabling ASPM will save power, but will introduce device latency. > > This patch adds ASPM support in Linux. It introduces a global policy for > ASPM, a sysfs file /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy can control > it. The interface can be used as a boot option too. Currently we have > below setting: > -default, BIOS default setting > -powersave, highest power saving mode, enable all available ASPM state > and clock power management > -performance, highest performance, disable ASPM and clock power > management > By default, the 'default' policy is used currently. > > In my test, power difference between powersave mode and performance mode > is about 1.3w in a system with 3 PCIE links. > > please review, any comments will be appreciated. quickly glanced this over since I recently disabled l1 ASPM for the e1000/e1000e driven 82573 device which has issues with l1 ASPM. that immediately gives me the question: how can I continue to disable 1l aspm by default for this device using this infrastructure? I do like the fact that there is a generic way to re-enable it for the users who want to use it. Can this change be done when the device is already active? Can you change this parameter per device/module? > + /* Clock PM state*/ > + unsigned int clk_pm_capable:1; > + unsigned int clk_pm_enabled:1; > + unsigned int bios_clk_state:1; might want to get rid of these bitfields? Cheers, Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/