Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-88546-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240227131410.35269-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> <e6441dc1-6821-4514-b285-ebc24114aece@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <e6441dc1-6821-4514-b285-ebc24114aece@oracle.com>
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:22:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMwGekn7++3TmKhe20s0bebM=hjSU82PhuWV9=0Cc9wfkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: drop the version constraints for sphinx and dependencies
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:39=E2=80=AFPM Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle=
com> wrote:
>
>
> On 27/02/2024 14:14, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > As discussed (see Links), there is some inertia to move to the recent
> > Sphinx versions for the doc build environment.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt b/Documentation/sphi=
nx/requirements.txt
> > index 5d47ed443949..1f3b98eee2c9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
> > @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
> > -# jinja2>=3D3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0
> > -jinja2<3.1
> > -# alabaster>=3D0.7.14 is not compatible with Sphinx<=3D3.3
> > -alabaster<0.7.14
> > -Sphinx=3D=3D2.4.4
> > +jinja2
> > +alabaster
> > +Sphinx
> >   pyyaml
>
> I know you wrote this as well, but just for the record I tried dropping
> jinja2 from this list and it still pulled it in automatically:

Vegard, I took your suggestion and removed jinja2 from the
requirements.txt in my patch v2:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20240301141800.30218-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmai=
l.com/

So, there is no need for any further future one-line deletion patch.

Jonathan, please pick the patch v2.

Lukas