Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-88564-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:39:07 -0500
From: =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>,
	"Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>,
	"Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing
 gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys
Message-ID: <40ae06f4-0cbe-40f0-84c8-9b57dfbeb91f@notapiano>
References: <20240229-gce-client-reg-add-missing-mt8192-95-v1-0-b12c233a8a33@collabora.com>
 <20240229-gce-client-reg-add-missing-mt8192-95-v1-2-b12c233a8a33@collabora.com>
 <22e2cf1b-9560-4f4b-b08b-a112e8e272a8@collabora.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <22e2cf1b-9560-4f4b-b08b-a112e8e272a8@collabora.com>

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/02/24 20:44, N?colas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> > Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
> > vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
> > parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
> > result in better performance.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
> > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: N?colas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> 
> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
> 
> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
> 
> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex

I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,
N?colas