Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-89729-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <ec00b007-a521-46a1-9b9e-1bd138b46522@tuxon.dev>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 14:21:12 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/39] ARM: at91: add support in SoC driver for new
 sam9x7
Content-Language: en-US
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
 nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
References: <20240223171342.669133-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
 <20240223172722.672592-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
In-Reply-To: <20240223172722.672592-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 23.02.2024 19:27, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add support for SAM9X7 SoC in the SoC driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Sorted the entries alphabetically as per comment from Claudiu
> - Updated EXID
> Note: Did not remove the Reviewed-by tag since the changes were only
> cosmetic and did not affect functionality
> ---
>  drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h |  9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> index cc9a3e107479..cae3452cbc60 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,29 @@ static const struct at91_soc socs[] __initconst = {
>  		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X60_D6K_EXID_MATCH,
>  		 "sam9x60 8MiB SDRAM SiP", "sam9x60"),
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_SAM9X7
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x75", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X72_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x72", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X70_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x70", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, SAM9X75_D1G_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x75 1Gb DDR3L SiP ", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, SAM9X75_D5M_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x75 512Mb DDR2 SiP", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, SAM9X75_D1M_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x75 128Mb DDR2 SiP", "sam9x7"),
> +	AT91_SOC(SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH, SAM9X75_D2G_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH,
> +		 "sam9x75 2Gb DDR3L SiP", "sam9x7"),

Could you keep these sorted after SoC name and memory size? E.g. see
sama7g5 entries, sama5dX entries.

> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5
>  	AT91_SOC(SAMA5D2_CIDR_MATCH, AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK,
>  		 AT91_CIDR_VERSION_MASK, SAMA5D21CU_EXID_MATCH,
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
> index 7a9f47ce85fb..fc4157c5f6e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs);
>  #define AT91SAM9X5_CIDR_MATCH		0x019a05a0
>  #define AT91SAM9N12_CIDR_MATCH		0x019a07a0
>  #define SAM9X60_CIDR_MATCH		0x019b35a0
> +#define SAM9X7_CIDR_MATCH		0x09750020
>  #define SAMA7G5_CIDR_MATCH		0x00162100
>  
>  #define AT91SAM9M11_EXID_MATCH		0x00000001
> @@ -74,6 +75,14 @@ at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs);
>  #define SAMA7G54_D2G_EXID_MATCH		0x00000020
>  #define SAMA7G54_D4G_EXID_MATCH		0x00000028
>  
> +#define SAM9X70_EXID_MATCH		0x00000005
> +#define SAM9X72_EXID_MATCH		0x00000004
> +#define SAM9X75_D1G_EXID_MATCH		0x00000018
> +#define SAM9X75_D2G_EXID_MATCH		0x00000020
> +#define SAM9X75_D1M_EXID_MATCH		0x00000003
> +#define SAM9X75_D5M_EXID_MATCH		0x00000010
> +#define SAM9X75_EXID_MATCH		0x00000000

Could you keep this chunk after SAM9X60_* one to have some kind of
alphanumerical sort?

> +
>  #define AT91SAM9XE128_CIDR_MATCH	0x329973a0
>  #define AT91SAM9XE256_CIDR_MATCH	0x329a93a0
>  #define AT91SAM9XE512_CIDR_MATCH	0x329aa3a0