Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-91046-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <2587412f-454d-472c-84b3-d7b9776a105a@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:58:37 -0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/aio: fix uaf in sys_io_cancel
Content-Language: en-US
To: Benjamin LaHaise <ben@communityfibre.ca>
Cc: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>,
 syzbot+b91eb2ed18f599dd3c31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, brauner@kernel.org,
 jack@suse.cz, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
 viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
References: <0000000000006945730612bc9173@google.com>
 <tencent_DC4C9767C786D2D2FDC64F099FAEFDEEC106@qq.com>
 <14f85d0c-8303-4710-b8b1-248ce27a6e1f@acm.org>
 <20240304170343.GO20455@kvack.org>
 <73949a4d-6087-4d8c-bae0-cda60e733442@acm.org>
 <20240304173120.GP20455@kvack.org>
 <5ee4df86-458f-4544-85db-81dc82c2df4c@acm.org>
 <20240304174721.GQ20455@kvack.org>
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240304174721.GQ20455@kvack.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/4/24 09:47, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:40:35AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 3/4/24 09:31, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>>> A revert is justified when a series of patches is buggy and had
>>> insufficient review prior to merging.
>>
>> That's not how Linux kernel development works. If a bug can get fixed
>> easily, a fix is preferred instead of reverting + reapplying a patch.
> 
> Your original "fix" is not right, and it wasn't properly tested.  Commit
> 54cbc058d86beca3515c994039b5c0f0a34f53dd needs to be reverted.

As I explained before, the above reply is not sufficiently detailed to
motivate a revert.

Bart.