Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-91079-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:17:07 -0500
From: =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kernel@collabora.com, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Allow coreboot modules to autoload and enable
 cbmem in the arm64 defconfig
Message-ID: <533d8c52-3b7d-4390-984b-05fa55996e31@notapiano>
References: <20240212-coreboot-mod-defconfig-v4-0-d14172676f6d@collabora.com>
 <36df8535-083f-4ce3-84c7-b8f652a9085b@notapiano>
 <a9063efe-1faf-4945-83ce-449a23d44fc5@app.fastmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <a9063efe-1faf-4945-83ce-449a23d44fc5@app.fastmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:56, N?colas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:50:04AM -0500, N?colas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> >> N?colas F. R. A. Prado (4):
> >>       firmware: coreboot: Generate modalias uevent for devices
> >>       firmware: coreboot: Generate aliases for coreboot modules
> >>       firmware: coreboot: Replace tag with id table in driver struct
> >>       arm64: defconfig: Enable support for cbmem entries in the coreboot table
> >
> > is it ok for Tzung-Bi to merge this last patch for the defconfig through the
> > chrome-platform-firmware tree?
> 
> I would much prefer to see this patch get sent to soc@kernel.org
> so I can pick it up through the soc tree. I'm usually not worried
> about bisection issues with defconfig changes since most users
> have their own .config anyway, and in this case I don't see
> any strict dependency and would just merge the patch directly.

Sounds good, I'll send it separately there. And you're right, the patch doesn't
have any dependency.

Thanks,
N?colas