Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-91203-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240228011133.1238439-1-hsinyi@chromium.org> <20240228011133.1238439-4-hsinyi@chromium.org>
 <CAD=FV=VV6fprky=v9koiVGmWcXKL3V4F2LOu7FriPbT_zT6xyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VV6fprky=v9koiVGmWcXKL3V4F2LOu7FriPbT_zT6xyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:05:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJMQK-gMvTVWr7b_+3+KLWCAMNQQEtoXg6qZLVset7GLRgeVqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/panel: panel-edp: Fix AUO 0x405c panel naming
 and add a variant
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:22=E2=80=AFPM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.or=
g> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:11=E2=80=AFPM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org=
> wrote:
> >
> > There are 2 different AUO panels using the same panel id. One of the
> > variants requires using overridden modes to resolve glitching issue as
> > described in commit 70e0d5550f5c ("drm/panel-edp: Add auo_b116xa3_mode"=
).
> > Other variants should use the modes parsed from EDID.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > v2: new
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> The previous version of this patch that we reverted also had an
> override for AUO 0x615c. Is that one no longer needed?
>

I currently don't have the exact panel to verify at hand. If the
dependent code is agreed and accepted, I will send out a patch for
this panel later.


>
> > @@ -1990,7 +2003,9 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] =
=3D {
> >         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x239b, &delay_200_500_e50, "B11=
6XAN06.1"),
> >         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x255c, &delay_200_500_e50, "B11=
6XTN02.5"),
> >         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x403d, &delay_200_500_e50, "B14=
0HAN04.0"),
> > -       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "B=
116XAK01.0"),
> > +       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "B=
116XAN04.0 "),
> > +       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY2('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "=
B116XAK01.0 ",
> > +                        &auo_b116xa3_mode),
>
> The name string now has a space at the end of it. I _guess_ that's OK.
> Hmmm, but I guess you should update the kernel doc for "struct
> edp_panel_entry". The name field is described as "Name of this panel
> (for printing to logs)". Now it should include that it's also used for
> matching EDIDs in some cases too.