Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-91510-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240304085933.1246964-1-qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
 <20240304090248.1247215-1-qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com> <91f0a339-ac0e-49df-bd26-dbfe1485308f@linaro.org>
 <CAJRtX8TPz_jTvPmuBW8t=mC+BR1kWmu=GS9K1k6ys7U9u0ENFw@mail.gmail.com> <0c957a95-9f82-41c2-8e2c-0b5bf4b061a4@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <0c957a95-9f82-41c2-8e2c-0b5bf4b061a4@linaro.org>
From: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:46:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJRtX8R-j6BfJC6We0Xh1e0sYe6_CyUjbznf7e-kNmcF0=Bcjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pwm: sophgo: add pwm support for Sophgo CV1800 SoC
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, 
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, 
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, 
	dlan@gentoo.org, inochiama@outlook.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:02=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2024 14:40, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 6:15=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04/03/2024 10:02, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> >>> Implement the PWM driver for CV1800.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +     ret =3D devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, devm_clk_rate_excl=
usive_put,
> >>> +                                    priv->clk);
> >>> +     if (ret) {
> >>> +             clk_rate_exclusive_put(priv->clk);
> >>> +             return ret;
> >>
> >> Please test this path - you have double put.
> >>
> >
> > Thank you for your reply. You're right. If the
> > devm_add_action_or_reset()  function
> > fails to add an action, it will call the action.
> >
> > By the way, if I need to resend the patch, should I wait for the
> > maintainer to review it, or
> > should I immediately correct this error and resend it.
>
> I recommend one patchset per day.
>

Thank you for your suggestion.

Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu