Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92017-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240304141426.163517-1-wangrui@loongson.cn> <CANiq72mvdVrzN19PC8pNrvuBLkOEEQ3yX0WG6JcWc+RVaSM2nA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mvdVrzN19PC8pNrvuBLkOEEQ3yX0WG6JcWc+RVaSM2nA@mail.gmail.com>
From: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 15:08:35 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHirt9iNPjHfMRS792E1MHbCQk1v6GnNVcb6LAvhskyyVg8bPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: rust: Switch to use built-in rustc target
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, 
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:09=E2=80=AFAM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 3:14=E2=80=AFPM WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> wro=
te:
> >
> > This commit switches to using the built-in rustc
> > loongarch64-unknown-none-softfloat target for LoongArch.
> >
> > The Rust samples have been tested with this commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>
> > ---
> > base-commit: ("rust: Refactor the build target to allow the use of buil=
tin targets")
>
> I couldn't apply it on top of commit f82811e22b48 in arm64's tree
> (which is the base? -- the offset differs significantly in the arch
> Makefile), but I nevertheless applied it manually on top of that one,
> build-tested it for loongarch64 and boot-tested it for x86_64:
>
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

Oops. The actual base is tag next-20240228. I just want to make it
clear that this patch needs to be based on ("rust: Refactor the build
target to allow the use of builtin targets").

Thanks!

Regards,
Rui

>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>