Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92049-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240304141426.163517-1-wangrui@loongson.cn> <CANiq72mvdVrzN19PC8pNrvuBLkOEEQ3yX0WG6JcWc+RVaSM2nA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAhV-H666zsMadZuzvcRxxkUxSpkka1tt9AJO_WctHDL8j_HNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H666zsMadZuzvcRxxkUxSpkka1tt9AJO_WctHDL8j_HNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:10:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72mHCNU2wGpELBbgOA8LKQhm_-RyG8+9bP9miYJOkUw2Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: rust: Switch to use built-in rustc target
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, 
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:58=E2=80=AFAM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>=
 wrote:
>
> The base of the loongarch tree doesn't contain the arm64 modifications
> now, so this patch is better to be applied on the rust tree with my
> Acked-by. But if you have some trouble doing that, I can also manually
> merge the arm64 parts to the loongarch tree, and then apply this
> patch. Thanks.

The rust tree doesn't have the arm64 changes either (i.e. they are in
the arm64 tree), so we would have the same issue.

Since it is quite late and there is no rush for this, I would suggest
applying it after the merge window in loongarch64 and thus avoiding a
merge. But, of course, up to you!

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel