Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92303-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:40:40 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: microchip: fix register write order in
 ksz8_ind_write8()
Message-ID: <ZecEuIgttoeXkr7T@pengutronix.de>
References: <20240304154135.161332-1-tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240304154135.161332-1-tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:41:35PM +0100, tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com wrote:
> From: "Tobias Jakobi (Compleo)" <tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com>
> 
> This bug was noticed while re-implementing parts of the kernel
> driver in userspace using spidev. The goal was to enable some
> of the errata workarounds that Microchip describes in their
> errata sheet [1].
> 
> Both the errata sheet and the regular datasheet of e.g. the KSZ8795
> imply that you need to do this for indirect register accesses:
> - write a 16-bit value to a control register pair (this value
>   consists of the indirect register table, and the offset inside
>   the table)
> - either read or write an 8-bit value from the data storage
>   register (indicated by REG_IND_BYTE in the kernel)
> 
> The current implementation has the order swapped. It can be
> proven, by reading back some indirect register with known content
> (the EEE register modified in ksz8_handle_global_errata() is one of
> these), that this implementation does not work.
> 
> Private discussion with Oleksij Rempel of Pengutronix has revealed
> that the workaround was apparantly never tested on actual hardware.
> 
> [1] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/OTH/ProductDocuments/Errata/KSZ87xx-Errata-DS80000687C.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi (Compleo) <tobias.jakobi.compleo@gmail.com>

The subject should have [PATCH net] for stable and Fixes tag:
Fixes: 7b6e6235b664 ("net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: handle eee specif erratum")

Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

Thank you!
Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |