Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92566-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:59:39 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Florian Fainelli
 <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>, Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@redhat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>, Radu Pirea
 <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>, Andy
 Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>, Nicolas Ferre
 <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@lwn.net>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
 UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Vladimir
 Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier
 <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>, Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 08/13] ptp: Add phc source and helpers to
 register specific PTP clock or get information
Message-ID: <20240305065939.2d419ff2@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240305111021.5c892d5a@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
References: <20240226-feature_ptp_netnext-v9-0-455611549f21@bootlin.com>
	<20240226-feature_ptp_netnext-v9-8-455611549f21@bootlin.com>
	<20240304185734.5f1a476c@kernel.org>
	<ZebZpspMCqjLES/W@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
	<20240305111021.5c892d5a@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:10:21 +0100 K=C3=B6ry Maincent wrote:
> > No. In the case of mvpp2 + marvell PHY, the two PTP implementations are
> > entirely separate. =20
>=20
> Yes the PTP clock can be independent from the netdev.
> We need to know which software layer register the PHC to be able to call =
its
> callbacks.
>=20
> My commit log is a bit small here. I will enhance it in the next version.

Still, wouldn't it be simpler to store all accessible PTP instances=20
in the netdev?