Received: by 2002:a89:2c3:0:b0:1ed:23cc:44d1 with SMTP id d3csp458096lqs; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 07:03:49 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXjlChayZfO4k6+zW/OuOp1XiuE2glbj4ND5+W+IImVoWZh7BFMLUw3qMsrGZOuZUcyc5SDWGj1NKdROMW9JERA6a0I05Ze2kdAsmBUVA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpRBVTOBVYWf+DcR1F0WCPi1zgehqyRkXrTexXNWKTIUFpAlfd0t8WEQKfKUVlxkV3ad0/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1898:b0:6e5:5872:2aa2 with SMTP id x24-20020a056a00189800b006e558722aa2mr16315523pfh.14.1709651029486; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:03:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v38-20020a634666000000b005dc8280f3b1si9936447pgk.303.2024.03.05.07.03.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Mar 2024 07:03:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92548-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=TEPaKGFv; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92548-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-92548-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57322B22488 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E6E126F14; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TEPaKGFv" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939166127; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709650437; cv=none; b=CjjGPC1BvGLHVkWG+AIvYfMkYYk0PAziihexq8Y2Zbq9o3P6MA2wOTLNLGIRdGd0sWgCdQU3k7t6daBc2/bqh/kNQgEjyVGUTKcLMpYR5lDWP+Y+RnBMbjH3F/1uk7eHasNnhusbBJ1ugikq/TIZkQ6mbyFc3bspC44tSdAa2L4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709650437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0dOILnGFoAvtiNpVkLvJTAajQBVZzcEdsS8kcLekRAc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=swzlYumg/4WPqHRVDUcDI5dKQ21E7Bbm1yMSD+YxdGI/mFwyCHR+uONLG8rgwawCkPTW3OzYU5TYgHuYBhEz8nsHo6G3/2y/zNsZhUMVCap/U7lj9ihYVbkGjDFWfWiXXWUU94VK3V6WvMVlLzmNQmnDwCkxUt2Zo4YDXLy/Sa0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TEPaKGFv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709650436; x=1741186436; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0dOILnGFoAvtiNpVkLvJTAajQBVZzcEdsS8kcLekRAc=; b=TEPaKGFvWY0hSvQij4TZB+K3ESCJ5/d3jYP1MVe4uWN0o/yvsjmhOFJZ z5uTkgFHNEkss2pwJV208iGppNMKGPqVDjVZ/yjSLGItzIm/ywro1NeRT 7mrrwkEEhE7qrBf23XOfdESRcmjG2HtXH8O2oWl0LePlkGoUgYMdCsnH1 L7UEm7D8xWBtxZEKdPrMrXoOOCUdU3KaWa6sHAG9J8NmagEjQlmMO5P5n WnSotjtozsobgSlkDErGxxddfRf/ufoRlcUQfM+czA9su0WzVW+KKXMwe AJZsGrCmDywPRmzL3RC3Xm9hcTVfA3vxSdaL7ueIjl2HMw8rHiltQgGy9 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11003"; a="29628512" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,205,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="29628512" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2024 06:53:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11003"; a="914142173" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,205,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="914142173" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2024 06:53:50 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rhWAt-0000000A0d6-1ywE; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 16:53:47 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:53:47 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Herve Codina Cc: Vadim Fedorenko , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Yury Norov , Rasmus Villemoes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Andrew Lunn , Mark Brown , Christophe Leroy , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for QMC HDLC Message-ID: References: <20240229141554.836867-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20240305120226.791bfe9a@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240305120226.791bfe9a@bootlin.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:23:32 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: .. > > I think it's a good series and next version will be final. The only question is > > possible use of the returned values from bitmap_scatter()/bitmap_gather(), the > > rest are minors. > > I replied about the reason why I didn't return any values from > bitmap_{scatter,gather}() in that patch 4 discussion. > > Are you ok to keep them returning void in this series ? Sure. We can amend that later if needed. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko