Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753984AbYAEHMo (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:12:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751913AbYAEHMg (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:12:36 -0500 Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:4945 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743AbYAEHMf (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:12:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:12:05 +1100 From: Herbert Xu To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Christian Kujau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter Zijlstra , Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6: possible recursive locking detected Message-ID: <20080105071205.GA28936@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <200801040006.47979.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080104083049.GC22803@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080104083049.GC22803@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1780 Lines: 34 On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:30:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > [ 1310.670986] ============================================= > > > [ 1310.671690] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > > > [ 1310.672097] 2.6.24-rc6 #1 > > > [ 1310.672421] --------------------------------------------- > > > [ 1310.672828] FahCore_a0.exe/3692 is trying to acquire lock: > > > [ 1310.673238] (&q->lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x1b/0x50 > > > [ 1310.673869] > > > [ 1310.673870] but task is already holding lock: > > > [ 1310.674567] (&q->lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x1b/0x50 > > > [ 1310.675267] > > > [ 1310.675268] other info that might help us debug this: > > > [ 1310.675952] 5 locks held by FahCore_a0.exe/3692: > > > [ 1310.676334] #0: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [] net_rx_action+0x60/0x1b0 > > > [ 1310.677251] #1: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [] netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x470 > > > [ 1310.677924] #2: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x32/0x210 > > > [ 1310.678460] #3: (clock-AF_INET){-.-?}, at: [] sock_def_readable+0x1e/0x80 > > > [ 1310.679250] #4: (&q->lock){++..}, at: [] __wake_up+0x1b/0x50 The net part might just be a red herring, since the problem is that __wake_up is somehow reentering itself. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/