Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92758-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:24:46 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, guoren@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] riscv: dts: add initial canmv-k230 and k230-evb
 dts
Message-ID: <20240305-ripcord-engraving-af3310d62a67@spud>
References: <mhng-f1aa91d4-211f-4eb4-a94d-a9d88b0d3f6a@palmer-ri-x1c9>
 <7A86D933-B85F-4B29-8D6D-AB414A42AC06@cyyself.name>
 <tencent_B2C1146D4947315C8018AE90EDC64F3E6207@qq.com>
 <20240305-shorten-disallow-eae65fdc8fdb@spud>
 <tencent_3638D6E106C784859837E6F3C10BDA688F0A@qq.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vhZQxYF104MnbLU5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tencent_3638D6E106C784859837E6F3C10BDA688F0A@qq.com>


--vhZQxYF104MnbLU5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:17:29AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 2024, at 01:01, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:37:16AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:

> >>> Link: https://github.com/cyyself/opensbi/commit/b113c1c01d700314a4a69=
6297ec09031a9399354
> >>>=20
> >>> Furthermore, I wonder whether a CPU node like this would be acceptabl=
e.
> >>> I don't have any other details of how another CPU from K230 SoC works=
 on
> >>> Linux.
> >=20
> > A CPU node like what? It is not clear to me.
>=20
> It in the k230.dtsi file. Only has big core there.

The node that is currently there looks fine to me.

--vhZQxYF104MnbLU5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZedVXgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0saeAP4pPuYdIfPpajZxYSLmdBJkzM9jXmO55zWBkmcKkm1OrwEAjXqI9zESV97A
Cl7lBRtyzckFGrJKMW1RI+mIFSqnGgg=
=bd1D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vhZQxYF104MnbLU5--