Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-92849-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJjo1SBcf=ZLi=iunaHiX6Mt5H6wkoPcecnZmiAcAyihw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240303104853.31511-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CAMuHMdXWdKZjjZc39iXfa6Nohtn+Xm9YvcF+YoRpNzCgeWD8tA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL_JsqJjo1SBcf=ZLi=iunaHiX6Mt5H6wkoPcecnZmiAcAyihw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:46:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McBf8Fbacnxozr+=-7AFQ0EOXbaG+zUhkNEb9g1mihmMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: make for_each_property_of_node() available to to !OF
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:56:04 +0100, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> said:
>
> Long term, I want to make struct device_node opaque. So if we really
> want to fix this, I think we'd want to convert this to use an iterator
> function. Though I guess any user would be mucking with struct
> property too, so the whole loop would need to be reworked. So in
> conclusion, don't use for_each_property_of_node(). :) Shrug.
>

I basically just need to get the list of all properties of a node. Even just
names. I'm working on a testing driver that needs to request all GPIOs assigned
to it over DT so it must find all `foo-gpios` properties.

How about:

int of_node_for_each_property(struct device_node *dn, int
(*func)(struct property *, void *), void *data)

as the iterator? You didn't say if you want to make struct property opaque as
well but even then it can be used with provided interfaces.

Bart