Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-93324-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:19:47 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
CC: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        LKML
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linaro.org>,
        "Abhinav
 Kumar" <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: Lenovo ThinkPad X13s regerssions (was Re: Linux regressions
 report for mainline [2024-02-25])
Message-ID: <20240306041947.GG3213752@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>
References: <170886726066.1516351.14377022830495300698@leemhuis.info>
 <Zd23ZKlNnDKPaU9I@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <83c6019f-9c6f-4ad1-87d5-e4f1bdaca93c@leemhuis.info>
 <ZecjcApvdZSGRysT@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZecjcApvdZSGRysT@hovoldconsulting.com>

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 02:51:44PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> [ +CC: Vinod, Bjorn, Abhinav ]
> 
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:33:39AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > [dropping Linus from CC, we can add him back later when needed]
> > 
> > On 27.02.24 11:20, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 01:21:46PM +0000, Regzbot (on behalf of Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Johan Hovold also deals with multiple issues affecting Lenovo ThinkPad
> > >> X13s, but he send out patch series to fix some or all of those[1], so
> > >> with a bit of luck those issues will soon be fixed as well.
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZctVmLK4zTwcpW3A@hovoldconsulting.com/
> > 
> > As 6.8 final might be just five days away, could you please help me out
> > with a short status update wrt. unresolved regressions from your side if
> > you have a minute? It's easy to get lost in all those issues. :-/ :-D
> 
> Heh. Indeed. It's been a rough cycle. :)
> 
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240217150228.5788-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/
> > > 
> > > This series addresses a use-after-free in the PMIC glink driver caused
> > > by DRM bridge changes in rc1 and which can result in the internal
> > > display not showing up on boot.
> > > 
> > > The DRM/SoC fixes here have now been merged to drm-misc for 6.8.
> > 
> > What about the others from that series? Can they wait till 6.9? Or are
> > they on track for 6.8?
> 
> Vinod, the PHY maintainer, just told me he will try to get them into
> 6.8.
> 
> > > But also with these fixes, there are still a couple of regressions
> > > related to the Qualcomm DRM runtime PM rework in 6.8-rc1. I'll send
> > > separate reports to track those.
> > 
> > Any decision yet if they are going to be reverted for now?
> >
> > Am I right assuming those would fix
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zd3kvD02Qvsh2Sid@hovoldconsulting.com/
> > which did not get even a single reply?
> 
> That was the hope, but I've managed to trigger a reset on disconnect
> once also with the runtime PM series reverted.
> 
> One of the patches from that series has already been reverted (to fix
> the VT console hotplug regression) and there is some indication that
> that was sufficient to address the issue with hotplug not being detected
> in X/Wayland too. I'm waiting for confirmation from some users that have
> not been able to use their external displays at all since 6.8-rc1, but
> it does seem to fix the X/Wayland issues I could reproduce here.
> 

I bumped my X13s to v6.8-rc7 earlier today and took it for a spin.

I was successfully able to plug/unplug my main display both in fbcon and
Wayland (sway) a number of times, I was able to boot with external
display connected and have it show up in fbcon and then survive into
sway. I tried suspending (echo mem > /sys/power/state) and got back from
that state a few times without problems.

Mixing connection/disconnection with being in suspended state was less
successful and I was able to crash the machine twice here - but I can't
say this worked before... (As previously we would not have eDP after
suspending with external display).

So, things are looking much better with -rc7, but of course, my test
scope is limited.

Regards,
Bjorn

> But either way, the reset on disconnect is still there, and have since
> been reproduced by Bjorn also on another Qualcomm platform without a
> hypervisor so that we've now got a call stack. I've heard that Abhinav
> is looking into that, but I don't know if there's any chance to have a
> fix ready this week.
> 
> Johan